Military loyalty and the failure of democratization in Africa: how ethnic armies shape the capacity of presidents to defy term limits. Issue 5 (29th July 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Harkness, Kristen A.
• Is Part Of: Democratization. Volume 24:Issue 5(2017)
• Page Start: 801
• Page End: 818
• Publication Date: 2017-07-29
• Subjects: Term limits -- civil-military relations -- ethnic politics -- African politics -- Senegal -- Cameroon; Democracy -- Periodicals; Economic history -- 1990- -- Periodicals; Democratization -- Periodicals; 321.8
• DOI: 10.1080/13510347.2016.1241244
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1351-0347

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The military plays a crucial role in furthering or hindering democratization in Africa. Beyond direct intervention through coups, armies more subtly and perniciously condition the political trajectory of states through their loyalty. Leaders who can rely on unwavering military support for protection against internal unrest face fewer risks and greater chances of success in rolling back liberalization and entrenching authoritarian practices. Constructing ethnic armies, which tie the fate of soldiers to the regime, is a profoundly powerful way to affect such loyalty. Through a mixed methods analysis of presidential bids to challenge term limits, including a paired comparison of Senegal and Cameroon, I demonstrate that ethnic armies triple the chances of success and, in so doing, encourage defiance in the first place: 82% of presidents backed by ethnic armies attempt to defy their constitutions and extend their hold on power, as opposed to 31% of other leaders. Conversely, ethnically diverse armies are far more likely to defend constitutional politics and constrain leaders to abide by term limits. The ethnic composition of the military thus critically shapes the prospects for African liberalization.