Comparison of bounding methods for stability analysis of systems with time-varying delays. Issue 7 (May 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Liu, Kun; Seuret, Alexandre
• Is Part Of: Journal of the Franklin Institute. Volume 354:Issue 7(2017:Jul.)
• Page Start: 2979
• Page End: 2993
• Publication Date: 2017-05
• Subjects: Science -- Periodicals; Technology -- Periodicals; Patents -- United States -- Periodicals; 505
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2017.02.007
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0016-0032

Abstract

Abstract: Integral inequalities for quadratic functions play an important role in the derivation of delay-dependent stability criteria for linear time-delay systems. Based on the Jensen inequality, a reciprocally convex combination approach was introduced by Park et al. (2011) for deriving delay-dependent stability criterion, which achieves the same upper bound of the time-varying delay as the one on the use of the Moon's et al. inequality. Recently, a new inequality called Wirtinger-based inequality that encompasses the Jensen inequality was proposed by Seuret and Gouaisbaut (2013) for the stability analysis of time-delay systems. In this paper, it is revealed that the reciprocally convex combination approach is effective only with the use of Jensen inequality. When the Jensen inequality is replaced by Wirtinger-based inequality, the Moon's et al. inequality together with convex analysis can lead to less conservative stability conditions than the reciprocally convex combination inequality. Moreover, we prove that the feasibility of an LMI condition derived by the Moon's et al. inequality as well as convex analysis implies the feasibility of an LMI condition induced by the reciprocally convex combination inequality. Finally, the efficiency of the methods is demonstrated by some numerical examples, even though the corresponding system with zero-delay as well as the system without the delayed term are not stable.