Authenticity, Value and Community Involvement in Heritage Management under the World Heritage and Intangible Heritage Conventions. (1st November 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Deacon, Harriet; Smeets, Rieks
• Is Part Of: Heritage & society. Volume 6:Number 2(2013)
• Page Start: 129
• Page End: 143
• Publication Date: 2013-11-01
• Subjects: cultural heritage -- intangible heritage -- heritage values -- authenticity -- cultural diversity -- Nara Document -- historic preservation -- heritage management -- world heritage; Cultural property -- Protection -- Periodicals; Cultural property -- Social aspects -- Periodicals; Historic preservation -- Periodicals; 363.69
• DOI: 10.1179/2159032X13Z.0000000009
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2159-032X

Abstract

Abstract : The United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) World Heritage and Intangible Heritage Conventions illustrate a broader trend towards greater appreciation of the role of communities concerned in identifying, managing and protecting their heritage today. This paper will discuss requirements for greater community involvement in heritage identification and management under the two Conventions, with special attention to the determination of heritage value and the question of authenticity. The Nara Document on Authenticity of 1994, incorporated into the Operational Guidelines of the World Heritage Convention in 2005 (UNESCO 2012a: Annex 4), encouraged a broader definition of authenticity that is sensitive to cultural context. Nevertheless, the determination of heritage value and authenticity remains in the hands of experts rather than communities associated with World Heritage properties. Although there is no reference to authenticity in the Intangible Heritage Convention (UNESCO 2003), States Parties are specifically requested to ensure that it is communities, groups or individuals concerned who identify the value of their own intangible heritage. Yet because of a lack of oversight mechanisms under the Convention, it is difficult to ensure that this is done, especially since there is no permanent mechanism for community representation to the Organs of either Convention.