Bartholin gland abscess during pregnancy: Report on 40 patients. (May 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Boujenah, J.; Le, S.N.V.; Benbara, A.; Bricou, A.; Murtada, R.; Carbillon, L.
• Is Part Of: European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology. Volume 212(2017)
• Page Start: 65
• Page End: 68
• Publication Date: 2017-05
• Subjects: Bartholin gland -- Abscesses -- Pregnancy; Obstetrics -- Periodicals; Gynecology -- Periodicals; Reproductive health -- Periodicals; Gynecology -- Periodicals; Obstetrics -- Periodicals; Reproduction -- Periodicals; Obstétrique -- Périodiques; Gynécologie -- Périodiques; Reproduction -- Périodiques; Verloskunde; Gynaecologie; Voortplanting (biologie); Gynecology; Obstetrics; Reproduction; Electronic journals; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 618.05
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.03.018
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0301-2115

Abstract

Abstract: Objective(s): To study the clinical and bacterial characteristic of Bartholin gland abscesses during pregnancy and the obstetric and neonatal outcomes. Study design: Retrospective cohort study of all patients with surgical treatment of Bartholin gland abscesses between 2004 and 2015 in our university center. Clinical and bacterial characteristics between pregnant and non-pregnant women were compared. Results: During the period study, 156 patients were included (40 pregnant and 116 non pregnant). The incidence of Bartholin gland abscesses during pregnancy was 0.13%. Eight (20%) abscesses occurred in the first, 18 (45%) in the second, 11 (47.5%) in the third trimester and 3 (7.5%) in the post-partum course. No severe perineal and neonatal infections occurred during pregnancy. One late miscarriage and one preterm delivery were observed. We found more multiparity in the pregnant woman group than in non-pregnant women (62.5% versus 45%, p < 0.05). A history of Bartholin gland abscesses were also more frequent in pregnant women (55% versus 30.1%, p < 0.05). First line antibiotic therapy was more frequent in non-pregnant women (20% versus 45%, p < 0.05). The rate of positive culture did not differ between the two groups (70% versus 55.2%). Among negative pus cultures, no patient in the pregnant woman group had received a first line antibiotic therapy, in contrast with non-pregnant women (0% versus 25%, p < 0.05). E. coli was the most common pathogen in the two groups (48.9% of positive cultures and 28.2% of the overall population). The distribution of bacterial taxa was not different between the two groups. Conclusion: Bacterial characteristics did not differ from non-pregnant women. Pregnancy could increase the occurrence of Bartholin gland abscesses in patients with previous surgical treatment of abscesses. When appropriate management is applied, maternal and neonatal outcomes are favorable, and severe infections are not to be expected.