Pedigree‐based estimation of covariance between dominance deviations and additive genetic effects in closed rabbit lines considering inbreeding and using a computationally simpler equivalent model. (June 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Fernández, E.N.; Legarra, A.; Martínez, R.; Sánchez, J.P.; Baselga, M.
• Is Part Of: Journal of animal breeding and genetics. Volume 134:Number 3(2017)
• Page Start: 184
• Page End: 195
• Publication Date: 2017-06
• Subjects: dominance -- genetic parameters -- heritability -- inbreeding -- prolificacy -- rabbits; Livestock -- Breeding -- Periodicals; Livestock -- Genetics -- Periodicals; 636.0820
• DOI: 10.1111/jbg.12267
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0931-2668

Abstract

Summary: Inbreeding generates covariances between additive and dominance effects (breeding values and dominance deviations). In this work, we developed and applied models for estimation of dominance and additive genetic variances and their covariance, a model that we call "full dominance, " from pedigree and phenotypic data. Estimates with this model such as presented here are very scarce both in livestock and in wild genetics. First, we estimated pedigree‐based condensed probabilities of identity using recursion. Second, we developed an equivalent linear model in which variance components can be estimated using closed‐form algorithms such as REML or Gibbs sampling and existing software. Third, we present a new method to refer the estimated variance components to meaningful parameters in a particular population, i.e., final partially inbred generations as opposed to outbred base populations. We applied these developments to three closed rabbit lines (A, V and H) selected for number of weaned at the Polytechnic University of Valencia. Pedigree and phenotypes are complete and span 43, 39 and 14 generations, respectively. Estimates of broad‐sense heritability are 0.07, 0.07 and 0.05 at the base versus 0.07, 0.07 and 0.09 in the final generations. Narrow‐sense heritability estimates are 0.06, 0.06 and 0.02 at the base versus 0.04, 0.04 and 0.01 at the final generations. There is also a reduction in the genotypic variance due to the negative additive–dominance correlation. Thus, the contribution of dominance variation is fairly large and increases with inbreeding and (over)compensates for the loss in additive variation. In addition, estimates of the additive–dominance correlation are −0.37, −0.31 and 0.00, in agreement with the few published estimates and theoretical considerations.