Clinical isolates and laboratory reference Candida species and strains have varying abilities to form biofilms. Issue 7 (6th September 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Alnuaimi, Ali D.; O'Brien‐Simpson, Neil M.; Reynolds, Eric C.; McCullough, Michael J.
• Is Part Of: FEMS yeast research. Volume 13:Issue 7(2013)
• Page Start: 689
• Page End: 699
• Publication Date: 2013-09-06
• Subjects: biofilm formation -- clinical -- laboratory -- assays; Yeast -- Periodicals; Yeasts -- Periodicals; 579.562
• DOI: 10.1111/1567-1364.12068
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1567-1356

Abstract

Abstract: Candida biofilms are a major virulence trait for this yeast. In this study, the biofilm‐forming ability of the major medically important clinical and laboratory reference strains was compared. Biofilms were quantified using traditional methods, that is, crystal violet (CV), tetrazolium (XTT) reduction and colony‐forming unit assays (CFU), and two new methods: an automated cell counter (ACC) and biofilm suspension turbidity (BST) method. Biofilms could be categorized based on biofilm biomass (high, medium and low) and growth state (high and low). Candida albicans genotypes, A, B and C, showed medium biofilm mass and low growth rate, and only one C. albicans laboratory strain, ATCC MYA‐2719, matched this biofilm category. Of all non‐ albicans Candida species tested, only Candida dubliniensis and Candida glabrata laboratory and clinical isolates had similar biofilm development. The ACC and BST methods for measuring biofilm significantly correlated with CV and CFU biofilm mass measurements. Thus, biofilm mass can be rapidly assessed using biofilm disruptive/cellular nondestructive methods allowing yeast biofilm cells to be used for further analysis. In conclusion, Candida laboratory reference strains and clinical isolates have been shown to form biofilms at different rates; hence for validity, the selection of laboratory reference strains in biofilm studies may be critical for virulence assessment.