Evaluation of a novel strategy of triage in the haematology ambulatory care setting. Issue 2 (4th August 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Slusar, Joanna; Couban, Stephen; Shivakumar, Sudeep Pappur
• Is Part Of: Journal of evaluation in clinical practice. Volume 23:Issue 2(2017)
• Page Start: 340
• Page End: 343
• Publication Date: 2016-08-04
• Subjects: clinical audit -- evaluation -- healthcare -- patient‐centred care; Clinical medicine -- Periodicals; 616.005
• DOI: 10.1111/jep.12616
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1356-1294

Abstract

Abstract: Background: In 2010, wait‐times for new patients referred to see a haematologist at our outpatient tertiary care centre clinic exceeded 6 months. The provision of written recommendations for a subset of referred patients was undertaken to reduce patient wait‐times. These recommendation letters outlined possible causes of the abnormality for which the patient was being referred and suggested a course of action for follow‐up, and patients were then managed by their referring practitioner. We sought to characterize the cohort of patients for whom written recommendations were written and assess whether written recommendations were a satisfactory alternative for the referring practitioner. Methods: All haematology patient referrals managed with written recommendations in 2010 were included in the study and were assessed one year later. Referring practitioners who received written recommendations were sent a short survey to evaluate their satisfaction with this process. Results: A total of 444 of 2400 referrals were managed with a letter. At 1‐year follow‐up, 58 (13%, 95% CI) of the abnormalities which prompted the referral had resolved and 201 (45%, 95%CI) had remained stable. There was a single haematology‐related death during the 1‐year follow‐up and the haematological abnormality worsened in 4 (1%) patients. Of 203 (71%) referring practitioners who responded to the satisfaction survey, 90% (95% CI) indicated that they would be satisfied with written recommendations in the future. Interpretation: The provision of written recommendations appears to be a safe and satisfactory alternative to an inperson outpatient assessment in certain well‐defined subsets of stable outpatients with haematologic abnormalities.