Lessons from African Union–United Nations cooperation in peace operations in the Central African Republic. Issue 2 (3rd April 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Carayannis, Tatiana; Fowlis, Mignonne
• Is Part Of: African security review. Volume 26:Issue 2(2017)
• Page Start: 220
• Page End: 236
• Publication Date: 2017-04-03
• Subjects: Central African Republic -- United Nations -- African Union -- peace operations -- peacekeeping -- MINUSCA; Human security -- Africa -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; 363.32096
• DOI: 10.1080/10246029.2017.1302707
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1024-6029

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Having hosted nearly a dozen peacekeeping and peacebuilding efforts since the mid-1990s, the Central African Republic (CAR) has been a laboratory for peace interventions – an 'early adopter' of various peace initiatives. It is thus a useful case from which to draw preliminary conclusions about the roles of the United Nations (UN) and regional organisations in resolving conflicts that involve entire regions. This article examines the roles of the UN and the African Union (AU) in CAR, where there is a long history of successive conflict resolution efforts that have been overseen by the international community and the region alternatively. The AU, regional economic communities (RECs) such as the Economic Community of Central African States (ECCAS), and regional leaders have also played important roles during the many initiatives aimed at resolving conflict in CAR. This article analyses the responses and relationship between these institutions and actors, beginning with the deployment of an inter-African monitoring mission in 1997. It is argued that peace operations in CAR have lacked a clear political strategy and a clear understanding of the situation, as well as the necessary sustained engagement from both regional and international actors. It is further argued that each subsequent intervention has added an additional layer to the previous one, thus creating a proliferation of peace operations whose mandates, troop contingents and leadership have not always been fit for purpose.