Evolutionary restoration potential evaluated through the use of a trait‐linked genetic marker. (27th March 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Apgar, Travis M.; Pearse, Devon E.; Palkovacs, Eric P.
• Is Part Of: Evolutionary applications. Volume 10:Number 5(2017)
• Page Start: 485
• Page End: 497
• Publication Date: 2017-03-27
• Subjects: anadromy -- dam removal -- ecological restoration -- fish passage -- freshwater resident -- life history variation -- Oncorhynchus mykiss -- rapid evolution; Evolution (Biology) -- Periodicals; Genetics -- Periodicals; Natural selection -- Periodicals; Ecology -- Periodicals; 576.8
• DOI: 10.1111/eva.12471
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1752-4571

Abstract

Abstract: Human‐driven evolution can impact the ecological role and conservation value of impacted populations. Most evolutionary restoration approaches focus on manipulating gene flow, but an alternative approach is to manipulate the selection regime to restore historical or desired trait values. Here we examined the potential utility of this approach to restore anadromous migratory behavior in coastal California steelhead trout ( Oncorhynchus mykiss ) populations. We evaluated the effects of natural and anthropogenic environmental variables on the observed frequency of alleles at a genomic marker tightly associated with migratory behavior across 39 steelhead populations from across California, USA. We then modeled the potential for evolutionary restoration at sites that have been impacted by anthropogenic barriers. We found that complete barriers such as dams are associated with major reductions in the frequency of anadromy‐associated alleles. The removal of dams is therefore expected to restore anadromy significantly. Interestingly, accumulations of large numbers of partial barriers (passable under at least some flow conditions) were also associated with significant reductions in migratory allele frequencies. Restoration involving the removal of partial barriers could be evaluated alongside dam removal and fishway construction as a cost‐effective tool to restore anadromous fish migrations. Results encourage broader consideration of in situ evolution during the development of habitat restoration projects.