Impact of individual resilience and safety climate on safety performance and psychological stress of construction workers: A case study of the Ontario construction industry. (June 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Chen, Yuting; McCabe, Brenda; Hyatt, Douglas
• Is Part Of: Journal of safety research. Volume 61(2017:May)
• Page Start: 167
• Page End: 176
• Publication Date: 2017-06
• Subjects: Safety climate -- Positive psychological states -- Canadian construction industry -- Injuries and accidents -- Psychological health; Industrial safety -- Periodicals; Accidents -- Prevention -- Periodicals; Safety -- Periodicals; Accidents, Occupational -- Periodicals; Sécurité du travail -- Périodiques; Accidents -- Prévention -- Périodiques; Accidents -- Prevention; Industrial safety; Periodicals; 363.1
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2017.02.014
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-4375

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: The construction industry has hit a plateau in terms of safety performance. Safety climate is regarded as a leading indicator of safety performance; however, relatively little safety climate research has been done in the Canadian construction industry. Safety climate may be geographically sensitive, thus it is necessary to examine how the construct of safety climate is defined and used to improve safety performance in different regions. On the other hand, more and more attention has been paid to job related stress in the construction industry. Previous research proposed that individual resilience may be associated with a better safety performance and may help employees manage stress. Unfortunately, few empirical research studies have examined this hypothesis. This paper aims to examine the role of safety climate and individual resilience in safety performance and job stress in the Canadian construction industry. Method: The research was based on 837 surveys collected in Ontario between June 2015 and June 2016. Structural equation modeling (SEM) techniques were used to explore the impact of individual resilience and safety climate on physical safety outcomes and on psychological stress among construction workers. Results: The results show that safety climate not only affected construction workers' safety performance but also indirectly affected their psychological stress. In addition, it was found that individual resilience had a direct negative impact on psychological stress but had no impact on physical safety outcomes. Conclusions: These findings highlight the roles of both organizational and individual factors in individual safety performance and in psychological well-being. Practical applications: Construction organizations need to not only monitor employees' safety performance, but also to assess their employees' psychological well-being. Promoting a positive safety climate together with developing training programs focusing on improving employees' psychological health — especially post-trauma psychological health — can improve the safety performance of an organization. Highlights: 80.6% of the respondents reported at least one occurrence of physical symptoms within the survey timeframe. 66.7% of the respondents reported at least one occurrence of safety events within the survey timeframe. 55.2% of the respondents reported at least one occurrence of psychological stress symptoms within the survey timeframe. Safety climate affected construction workers' physical safety outcomes as well as their psychological wellbeing. Individual resilience was negatively associated with construction workers' psychological stresses.