A systematic literature review on the architecture of business process management systems. (June 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Pourmirza, Shaya; Peters, Sander; Dijkman, Remco; Grefen, Paul
• Is Part Of: Information systems. Volume 66(2017)
• Page Start: 43
• Page End: 58
• Publication Date: 2017-06
• Subjects: Business process management system -- Workflow management system -- Information systems architecture -- Systematic literature review; Database management -- Periodicals; Electronic data processing -- Periodicals; Bases de données -- Gestion -- Périodiques; Informatique -- Périodiques; Database management; Electronic data processing; Periodicals; 005.7
• DOI: 10.1016/j.is.2017.01.007
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0306-4379

Abstract

Highlights: 41 existing BPMS architectures in the literature were systematically analyzed. The architectures were compared based on a 5-aspect classification framework. Most of the architectures have been composed from scratch. Around 54% of the architectures have already been implemented. Few architectures have adequately addressed the concept of service collaborations. Abstract: Due to the high complexity of modern-day business, organizations are forced to quickly adapt to a wide range of cutting-edge developments. These developments influence the structure and behavior of the business processes that represent the work and of the Business Process Management Systems (BPMS) that support them. Consequently, the architecture of BPMS has changed a lot over the past two decades. However, there is no systematic overview of the research done in this area since the Workflow reference model first set the standard for BPMS architecture in 1995. To bridge this gap, this paper presents a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) of BPMS architectures, by analyzing 41 primary studies taken from a gross collection of 608 research papers. The BPMS architectures that served as primary studies were compared with respect to the reference architecture that they are based on, the level of elaboration at which they are described, the architectural styles that they use, the means with which they are evaluated, and the functionality that they support. The resulting comparison provides an overview of and insights into the current body of knowledge on BPMS architectures.