Assessing tidal marsh resilience to sea-level rise at broad geographic scales with multi-metric indices. (December 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Assessing tidal marsh resilience to sea-level rise at broad geographic scales with multi-metric indices. (December 2016)
- Main Title:
- Assessing tidal marsh resilience to sea-level rise at broad geographic scales with multi-metric indices
- Authors:
- Raposa, Kenneth B.
Wasson, Kerstin
Smith, Erik
Crooks, Jeffrey A.
Delgado, Patricia
Fernald, Sarah H.
Ferner, Matthew C.
Helms, Alicia
Hice, Lyndie A.
Mora, Jordan W.
Puckett, Brandon
Sanger, Denise
Shull, Suzanne
Spurrier, Lindsay
Stevens, Rachel
Lerberg, Scott - Abstract:
- Abstract: Tidal marshes and the ecosystem services they provide may be at risk from sea-level rise (SLR). Tidal marsh resilience to SLR can vary due to differences in local rates of SLR, geomorphology, sediment availability and other factors. Understanding differences in resilience is critical to inform coastal management and policy, but comparing resilience across marshes is hindered by a lack of simple, effective analysis tools. Quantitative, multi-metric indices are widely employed to inform management of benthic aquatic ecosystems, but not coastal wetlands. Here, we develop and apply tidalma rshr esilience tos ea-level rise (MARS) indices incorporating ten metrics that contribute to overall marsh resilience to SLR. We applied MARS indices to tidal marshes at 16 National Estuarine Research Reserves across the conterminous U.S. This assessment revealed moderate resilience overall, although nearly all marshes had some indication of risk. Pacific marshes were generally more resilient to SLR than Atlantic ones, with the least resilient marshes found in southern New England. We provide a calculation tool to facilitate application of the MARS indices to additional marshes. MARS index scores can inform the choice of the most appropriate coastal management strategy for a marsh: moderate scores call for actions to enhance resilience while low scores suggest investment may be better directed to adaptation strategies such as creating opportunities for marsh migration rather thanAbstract: Tidal marshes and the ecosystem services they provide may be at risk from sea-level rise (SLR). Tidal marsh resilience to SLR can vary due to differences in local rates of SLR, geomorphology, sediment availability and other factors. Understanding differences in resilience is critical to inform coastal management and policy, but comparing resilience across marshes is hindered by a lack of simple, effective analysis tools. Quantitative, multi-metric indices are widely employed to inform management of benthic aquatic ecosystems, but not coastal wetlands. Here, we develop and apply tidalma rshr esilience tos ea-level rise (MARS) indices incorporating ten metrics that contribute to overall marsh resilience to SLR. We applied MARS indices to tidal marshes at 16 National Estuarine Research Reserves across the conterminous U.S. This assessment revealed moderate resilience overall, although nearly all marshes had some indication of risk. Pacific marshes were generally more resilient to SLR than Atlantic ones, with the least resilient marshes found in southern New England. We provide a calculation tool to facilitate application of the MARS indices to additional marshes. MARS index scores can inform the choice of the most appropriate coastal management strategy for a marsh: moderate scores call for actions to enhance resilience while low scores suggest investment may be better directed to adaptation strategies such as creating opportunities for marsh migration rather than attempting to save existing marshes. The MARS indices thus provide a powerful new approach to evaluate tidal marsh resilience and to inform development of adaptation strategies in the face of SLR. Highlights: Resilience to sea-level rise was assessed at 16 tidal marshes across 13 U.S. states. Multi-metric indices were applied using National Estuarine Research Reserve data. Overall, most marshes have moderate resilience, but some are at very high risk. A "do-it-yourself" tool is provided so the new indices can be applied elsewhere. Explicit links are made between index scores and recommended management actions. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Biological conservation. Volume 204:Part B(2016)
- Journal:
- Biological conservation
- Issue:
- Volume 204:Part B(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 204, Issue 2 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 204
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0204-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 263
- Page End:
- 275
- Publication Date:
- 2016-12
- Subjects:
- Assessment -- Index -- Marsh -- National Estuarine Research Reserve System (NERRS) -- Resilience -- Sea-level rise
Conservation of natural resources -- Periodicals
Nature conservation -- Periodicals
Ecology -- Periodicals
Environment -- Periodicals
Environmental Pollution -- Periodicals
Electronic journals
333.9516 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00063207 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.015 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0006-3207
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 2075.100000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 759.xml