Linear energy transfer distributions in the brainstem depending on tumour location in intensity-modulated proton therapy of paediatric cancer. (4th May 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Fjæra, Lars Fredrik; Li, Zuofeng; Ytre-Hauge, Kristian S.; Muren, Ludvig P.; Indelicato, Daniel J.; Lassen-Ramshad, Yasmin; Engeseth, Grete May; Brydøy, Marianne; Mairani, Andrea; Flampouri, Stella; Dahl, Olav; Stokkevåg, Camilla H.
• Is Part Of: Acta oncologica. Volume 56:Number 6(2017)
• Page Start: 763
• Page End: 768
• Publication Date: 2017-05-04
• Subjects: Oncology -- Periodicals; Cancer -- Treatment -- Periodicals; 616.992
• DOI: 10.1080/0284186X.2017.1314007
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0284-186X

Abstract

Abstract: Background: For tumours near organs at risk, there is concern about unintended increase in biological dose from elevated linear energy transfer (LET) at the distal end of treatment fields. The objective of this study was therefore to investigate how different paediatric posterior fossa tumour locations impact LET and biological dose to the brainstem during intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT). Material and methods: Multiple IMPT plans were generated for four different simulated tumour locations relative to the brainstem for a five-year-old male patient. A prescribed dose of 59.4 Gy(RBE) was applied to the planning target volumes (PTVs). Plans with two lateral and one posterior non-coplanar fields were created, along with plans with modified field arrangements. The dose-averaged LET (LETd ) and the physical dose × RBELET ( D × RBELET ), where RBELET =1+ c × LETd, were calculated using the FLUKA Monte Carlo code. A scaling parameter c was applied to make the RBELET represent variations in the biological effect due to LET. Results: High LETd values surrounded parts of the PTV and encompassed portions of the brainstem. Mean LETd values in the brainstem were 3.2–6.6 keV/μm. The highest absolute brainstem LETd values were seen with the tumour located most distant from the brainstem, whereas lower and more homogeneous LETd values were seen when the tumour invaded the brainstem. In contrast, the highest mean D × RBELET values were found in the latter case (54.0 Gy(RBE)), while the case with largest distance between tumour and brainstem had a mean D × RBELET of 1.8 Gy(RBE). Conclusions: Using IMPT to treat posterior fossa tumours may result in high LETd values within the brainstem, particularly if the tumour volume is separated from the brainstem. However, the D × RBELET was greater for tumours that approached or invaded the brainstem. Changing field angles showed a reduction of LETd and D × RBELET in the brainstem.