Improving the efficiency of breast radiotherapy treatment planning using a semi‐automated approach. (30th November 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mitchell, Robert A; Wai, Philip; Colgan, Ruth; Kirby, Anna M; Donovan, Ellen M
• Is Part Of: Journal of applied clinical medical physics. Volume 18:Number 1(2017)
• Page Start: 18
• Page End: 24
• Publication Date: 2016-11-30
• Subjects: automated planning -- autosegmentation -- breast -- dosimetry -- radiotherapy; Medical physics -- Periodicals; Clinical medicine -- Periodicals; Health Physics; Clinical Medicine; Electronic journals; Periodicals; Periodicals; Fulltext; Internet Resources; 610.153
• DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12006
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1526-9914

Abstract

Abstract: Objectives: To reduce treatment planning times while maintaining plan quality through the introduction of semi‐automated planning techniques for breast radiotherapy. Methods: Automatic critical structure delineation was examined using the Smart Probabilistic Image Contouring Engine (SPICE) commercial autosegmentation software (Philips Radiation Oncology Systems, Fitchburg, WI) for a cohort of ten patients. Semiautomated planning was investigated by employing scripting in the treatment planning system to automate segment creation for breast step‐and‐shoot planning and create objectives for segment weight optimization; considerations were made for three different multileaf collimator (MLC) configurations. Forty patients were retrospectively planned using the script and a planning time comparison performed. Results: The SPICE heart and lung outlines agreed closely with clinician‐defined outlines (median Dice Similarity Coefficient > 0.9); median difference in mean heart dose was 0.0 cGy (range −10.8 to 5.4 cGy). Scripted treatment plans demonstrated equivalence with their clinical counterparts. No statistically significant differences were found for target parameters. Minimal ipsilateral lung dose increases were also observed. Statistically significant ( P < 0.01) time reductions were achievable for MLCi and Agility MLC (Elekta Ltd, Crawley, UK) plans (median 4.9 and 5.9 min, respectively). Conclusions: The use of commercial autosegmentation software enables breast plan adjustment based on doses to organs at risk. Semi‐automated techniques for breast radiotherapy planning offer modest reductions in planning times. However, in the context of a typical department's breast radiotherapy workload, minor savings per plan translate into greater efficiencies overall.