Cardiovascular risk in patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysms. (23rd February 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Saratzis, Athanasios; Sidloff, David; Bown, Matthew J
• Is Part Of: Lancet. Volume 389(2017)Supplement 1
• Page Start: S89
• Publication Date: 2017-02-23
• Subjects: Medicine -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; Medicine; Medicine; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 610.5
• DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30485-3
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0140-6736

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a cardiovascular health problem. Ultrasound screening has been shown to reduce the risk of AAA-related, but not all-cause, mortality. The recent introduction of screening in several countries has meant that thousands of patients with a small AAA (<5·5cm) that does not require immediate treatment are diagnosed annually. We sought to investigate the cardiovascular profiles of patients with ectatic aortas and assess whether participation in screening reduces cardiovascular risk. Methods: We used three sets of data: from the National Health Service AAA Screening Programme (NAAASP) during the 2013–14 round that were linked with Health Episode Statistics (HES) (235 409 individuals); a subset of the Framingham Study population who had an abdominal CT scan in 2004–05 and were followed up for 10 years (1383 individuals); and data for patients with a small AAA who had been in surveillance for at least 1 year in the UK Aneurysm Growth Study (UKAGS) (384 individuals) or from a national UK audit (1538 individuals), to assess cardiovascular risk and events. Findings: In the linked NAAASP–HES cohort, cardiovascular mortality was 0·30% (95% CI 0·28–0·32) for individuals with an abdominal aortic diameter of less than 2·5 cm; 0·81% (0·51–1·11) for those between 2·5 and 2·9 cm; and 1·30% (0·90–1·71) for those less than 3·0 cm. Death from a cardiovascular event was more likely for individuals with a small AAA than for those without AAA (risk ratio 4·33, 95% CI 3·15–5·97). In the Framingham cohort, abdominal aortic diameter was independently associated with cardiovascular events (hazard ratio [HR] 1·1, 95% CI 1·02–1·18; p<0·0001). An abdominal aortic diameter of more than 2·5 cm was also associated with cardiovascular events (HR 7·6, 95% CI 5·1–11·3; p<0·0001). In the UKAGS and audit populations, patients were not more likely to take antiplatelet agents or statins after entering screening surveillance; cholesterol concentrations and blood pressure also increased. Interpretation: In these contemporary large cohorts of patients with small AAA, cardiovascular events and death were common and were the leading cause of death. The implication is that patients are not more likely to receive cardiovascular protection if they enter screening or surveillance with existing protocols. Cardiovascular risk reduction interventions should be implemented in screening programmes in the future. Funding: Academy of Medical Sciences, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, NIHR.