Evaluation of inhomogeneity correction factors for 6 MV flattening filter‐free beams with brass compensators. (6th May 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Robinson, Joshua; Opp, Daniel; Zhang, Geoffrey; Feygelman, Vladimir
• Is Part Of: Journal of applied clinical medical physics. Volume 14:Number 3(2013)
• Page Start: 226
• Page End: 231
• Publication Date: 2013-05-06
• Subjects: flattening filter‐free -- compensator -- inhomogeneity correction factor -- dose calculation accuracy -- lung; Medical physics -- Periodicals; Clinical medicine -- Periodicals; Health Physics; Clinical Medicine; Electronic journals; Periodicals; Periodicals; Fulltext; Internet Resources; 610.153
• DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v14i3.3990
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1526-9914

Abstract

Abstract : The 6 MV flattening filter‐free (FFF) beam has been commissioned for use with compensators at our institution. This novel combination promises advantages in mitigating tumor motion due to the reduced treatment time made possible by the greatly increased dose rate of the FFF beam. Given the different energy spectrum of the FFF beam and the beam hardening effect of the compensator, the accuracy of the treatment planning system (TPS) model in the presence of low‐density heterogeneities cannot be assumed. Therefore, inhomogeneity correction factors (ICF) for an FFF beam attenuated by brass slabs were measured and compared to the TPS calculations in this work. The ICF is the ratio of the point dose in the presence of inhomogeneity to the dose in the same point in a homogeneous medium. The ICFs were measured with an ion chamber at a number of points in a flat water‐equivalent slab phantom containing a 7.5 cm deep heterogeneity (air or 0.27 g / cm 3 wood). Comparisons for the FFF beam were carried out for the field sizes from 5 × 5 to 20 × 20 cm 2 with the brass slabs ranging from 0 to 5 cm in thickness. For a low‐density wood heterogeneity in a slab phantom, with the exception of the point 1 cm beyond the proximal buildup interface, the TPS handles the inhomogeneity correction with the brass‐filtered 6 MV FFF beam at the requisite 2% error level. The combinations of field sizes and compensator thicknesses when the error exceeds 2% (2.6% maximum) are not likely to be experienced in clinical practice. In terms of heterogeneity corrections, the beam model is adequate for clinical use. PACS number: 87.56.ng