Anterolateral ligament reconstruction with autologous grafting: A biomechanical study. (May 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Anterolateral ligament reconstruction with autologous grafting: A biomechanical study. (May 2017)
- Main Title:
- Anterolateral ligament reconstruction with autologous grafting: A biomechanical study
- Authors:
- Monaco, E.
Lanzetti, R.M.
Fabbri, M.
Redler, A.
De Carli, A.
Ferretti, A. - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: To evaluate the reliability of the Iliotibial band compared to gracilis tendon as a graft to be used in anterolateral ligament reconstruction. Methods: Gracilis tendon and a strip of Iliotibial band compared were harvested from 8 fresh human cadaveric knees. The gracilis tendon was prepared to obtain a graft of 10 cm in length (Group 1). Iliotibial band compared was prepared to obtain a graft of 10 cm in length and 0.5 cm in width from the middle portion (Group 2). All the specimens were fixed on a servo hydraulic tensile machine with dedicated cryo-clamp. The loading protocol, used to compare the previously published results of ultimate failure load and Stiffness of the anterolateral ligament (Group 3), included a cyclic preconditioning between 10 and 25 N at 0.1 Hz for 10 cycles and then a load to failure test at 20 mm/min. Findings: Gracilis tendon showed higher Ultimante Failure Load and stiffness when compared to a strip of Iliotibial band. Gracilis tendon and a strip of Iliotibial band compared showed higher Ultimante Failure Load and stiffness when compared with native anterolateral ligament as reported by Kennedy. Interpretation: Both grafts tested in the present studies are suitable for an anatomical anterolateral ligament reconstruction. Highlights: Gracilis and Iliotibial-band are the most used graft for the ALL reconstruction. Gracilis and Iliotibial-band showed higher UFl than native ALL. Gracilis and Iliotibial-band showed higher stiffnessAbstract: Background: To evaluate the reliability of the Iliotibial band compared to gracilis tendon as a graft to be used in anterolateral ligament reconstruction. Methods: Gracilis tendon and a strip of Iliotibial band compared were harvested from 8 fresh human cadaveric knees. The gracilis tendon was prepared to obtain a graft of 10 cm in length (Group 1). Iliotibial band compared was prepared to obtain a graft of 10 cm in length and 0.5 cm in width from the middle portion (Group 2). All the specimens were fixed on a servo hydraulic tensile machine with dedicated cryo-clamp. The loading protocol, used to compare the previously published results of ultimate failure load and Stiffness of the anterolateral ligament (Group 3), included a cyclic preconditioning between 10 and 25 N at 0.1 Hz for 10 cycles and then a load to failure test at 20 mm/min. Findings: Gracilis tendon showed higher Ultimante Failure Load and stiffness when compared to a strip of Iliotibial band. Gracilis tendon and a strip of Iliotibial band compared showed higher Ultimante Failure Load and stiffness when compared with native anterolateral ligament as reported by Kennedy. Interpretation: Both grafts tested in the present studies are suitable for an anatomical anterolateral ligament reconstruction. Highlights: Gracilis and Iliotibial-band are the most used graft for the ALL reconstruction. Gracilis and Iliotibial-band showed higher UFl than native ALL. Gracilis and Iliotibial-band showed higher stiffness than native ALL. Gracilis and Iliotibial-band are suitable graft for ALL reconstruction. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Clinical biomechanics. Volume 44(2017)
- Journal:
- Clinical biomechanics
- Issue:
- Volume 44(2017)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 44, Issue 2017 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 44
- Issue:
- 2017
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0044-2017-0000
- Page Start:
- 99
- Page End:
- 103
- Publication Date:
- 2017-05
- Subjects:
- Anterolateral ligament -- Gracilis tendon -- Ileotibial band -- Biomechanics
Biomechanics -- Periodicals
Osteopathic medicine -- Periodicals
Biomechanics -- Periodicals
Osteopathic Medicine -- Periodicals
612.76 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/02680033 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2017.03.013 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0268-0033
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3286.262800
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 49.xml