Assessing driving forces of land use and land cover change by a mixed-method approach in north-eastern Ghana, West Africa. (1st July 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kleemann, Janina; Baysal, Gülendam; Bulley, Henry N.N.; Fürst, Christine
• Is Part Of: Journal of environmental management. Volume 196(2017)
• Page Start: 411
• Page End: 442
• Publication Date: 2017-07-01
• Subjects: Land degradation -- Population pressure -- Remote sensing -- Expert interviews -- Agriculture -- Upper East Region; Environmental policy -- Periodicals; Environmental management -- Periodicals; Environment -- Periodicals; Ecology -- Periodicals; 363.705
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.01.053
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0301-4797

Abstract

Abstract: Land use and land cover change (LULCC) is the result of complex human-environmental interactions. The high interdependencies in social-ecological systems make it difficult to identify the main drivers. However, knowledge of key drivers of LULCC, including indirect (underlying) drivers which cannot be easily determined by spatial or economic analyses, is essential for land use planning and especially important in developing countries. We used a mixed-method approach in order to detect drivers of LULCC in the Upper East Region of northern Ghana by different qualitative and quantitative methods which were compared in a confidence level analysis. Viewpoints from experts help to answer why the land use is changing, since many triggering effects, especially non-spatial and indirect drivers of LULCC, are not measurable by other methodological approaches. Geo-statistical or economic analyses add to validate the relevance of the expert-based results. First, we conducted in-depth interviews and developed a list of 34 direct and indirect drivers of LULCC. Subsequently, a group of experts was asked in a questionnaire to select the most important drivers by using a Likert scale. This information was complemented by remote sensing analysis. Finally, the driver analysis was compared to information from literature. Based on these analyses there is a very high confidence that population growth, especially in rural areas, is a major driver of LULCC. Further, current farming practice, bush fires, livestock, the road network and climate variability were the main direct drivers while the financial capital of farmers and customary norms regarding land tenure were listed as important indirect drivers with high confidence. Many of these driving forces, such as labour shortage and migration, are furthermore interdependent. Governmental laws, credits, the service by extension officers, conservational agriculture and foreign agricultural medium-scale investments are currently not driving land use changes. We conclude that the mixed-method approach improves the confidence of findings and the selection of most important drivers for modelling LULCC, especially in developing countries. Highlights: A combined qualitative and quantitative analysis for assessing drivers of LULCC. Rural population growth is with very high confidence the main driver of LULCC. Technological and political parameters are currently not driving LULCC. The confidence table is a useful tool to compare results of a mixed-method approach.