Subject‐level matching for imbalance in cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters. (25th June 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Leon, Andrew C.; Demirtas, Hakan; Li, Chunshan; Hedeker, Donald
• Is Part Of: Pharmaceutical statistics. Volume 12:Number 5(2013:Sep./Oct.)
• Page Start: 268
• Page End: 274
• Publication Date: 2013-06-25
• Subjects: cluster randomized controlled trials -- propensity adjustment -- bias reduction; Pharmacy -- Statistical methods -- Periodicals; Pharmacy -- Statistics -- Periodicals; 615.10727
• DOI: 10.1002/pst.1580
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1539-1604

Abstract

Abstract : In a cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT), the number of randomized units is typically considerably smaller than in trials where the unit of randomization is the patient. If the number of randomized clusters is small, there is a reasonable chance of baseline imbalance between the experimental and control groups. This imbalance threatens the validity of inferences regarding post‐treatment intervention effects unless an appropriate statistical adjustment is used. Here, we consider application of the propensity score adjustment for cluster RCTs. For the purpose of illustration, we apply the propensity adjustment to a cluster RCT that evaluated an intervention to reduce suicidal ideation and depression. This approach to adjusting imbalance had considerable bearing on the interpretation of results. A simulation study demonstrates that the propensity adjustment reduced well over 90% of the bias seen in unadjusted models for the specifications examined. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.