Comparison of multiple non‐invasive methods of measuring cardiac output during pregnancy reveals marked heterogeneity in the magnitude of cardiac output change between women. Issue 8 (24th April 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparison of multiple non‐invasive methods of measuring cardiac output during pregnancy reveals marked heterogeneity in the magnitude of cardiac output change between women. Issue 8 (24th April 2017)
- Main Title:
- Comparison of multiple non‐invasive methods of measuring cardiac output during pregnancy reveals marked heterogeneity in the magnitude of cardiac output change between women
- Authors:
- Petersen, John W.
Liu, Jing
Chi, Yueh‐Yun
Lingis, Melissa
Williams, R. Stan
Rhoton‐Vlasak, Alice
Segal, Mark S.
Conrad, Kirk P. - Abstract:
- Abstract: Various non‐invasive methods are available to measure cardiac output (CO) during pregnancy. We compared serial measures of CO using various methods to determine which provided the least variability. Ten patients with spontaneous pregnancy had estimation of CO at baseline prior to becoming pregnant and at the end of the first and third trimesters. Echocardiographic data were used to estimate CO using the Teichholz method, Simpson's biplane method, and the Doppler determined velocity time integral (VTI) method. In addition, a Bioz Dx device was used to estimate CO by impedance cardiography. CO estimated with the VTI method had the lowest beat‐to‐beat variability. CO estimated with the VTI method was higher than CO estimated with the 2D‐Teichholz method and Simpson's method. The percent change in CO during pregnancy was similar for all echo methods (VTI, Teichholz, and Simpson's biplane). Baseline CO determined with impedance cardiography was higher than CO determined with the VTI method. However, change in CO during pregnancy was significantly lower when measured with impedance cardiography. There was marked heterogeneity in the degree of rise in CO during the first trimester (−3 to 55%). The wide variation in the gestational rise in CO was unexpected, and at least in part secondary to variable increase in heart rate. We recommend the use of the Doppler determined VTI method for the estimation of CO in pregnancy. Abstract : This prospective cohort study comparesAbstract: Various non‐invasive methods are available to measure cardiac output (CO) during pregnancy. We compared serial measures of CO using various methods to determine which provided the least variability. Ten patients with spontaneous pregnancy had estimation of CO at baseline prior to becoming pregnant and at the end of the first and third trimesters. Echocardiographic data were used to estimate CO using the Teichholz method, Simpson's biplane method, and the Doppler determined velocity time integral (VTI) method. In addition, a Bioz Dx device was used to estimate CO by impedance cardiography. CO estimated with the VTI method had the lowest beat‐to‐beat variability. CO estimated with the VTI method was higher than CO estimated with the 2D‐Teichholz method and Simpson's method. The percent change in CO during pregnancy was similar for all echo methods (VTI, Teichholz, and Simpson's biplane). Baseline CO determined with impedance cardiography was higher than CO determined with the VTI method. However, change in CO during pregnancy was significantly lower when measured with impedance cardiography. There was marked heterogeneity in the degree of rise in CO during the first trimester (−3 to 55%). The wide variation in the gestational rise in CO was unexpected, and at least in part secondary to variable increase in heart rate. We recommend the use of the Doppler determined VTI method for the estimation of CO in pregnancy. Abstract : This prospective cohort study compares cardiac output measured by multiple non‐invasive methods in each of ten healthy pregnant subjects. Cardiac output measured with a Doppler echo method based on velocity time integral had the lowest beat‐to‐beat variability. Changes in heart rate and systemic vascular resistance were most closely associated with changes in cardiac output during pregnancy. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Physiological reports. Volume 5:Issue 8(2017)
- Journal:
- Physiological reports
- Issue:
- Volume 5:Issue 8(2017)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 5, Issue 8 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 5
- Issue:
- 8
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0005-0008-0000
- Page Start:
- n/a
- Page End:
- n/a
- Publication Date:
- 2017-04-24
- Subjects:
- Cardiac Output -- echocardiography -- pregnancy
Physiology -- Periodicals
571 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)2051-817X ↗
http://physreports.physiology.org ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.14814/phy2.13223 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2051-817X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 2132.xml