Measurement Invariance Testing with Many Groups: A Comparison of Five Approaches. Issue 4 (4th July 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kim, Eun Sook; Cao, Chunhua; Wang, Yan; Nguyen, Diep T.
• Is Part Of: Structural equation modeling. Volume 24:Issue 4(2017)
• Page Start: 524
• Page End: 544
• Publication Date: 2017-07-04
• Subjects: approximate measurement invariance -- Bayesian -- multilevel CFA -- multilevel factor mixture modeling; Multivariate analysis -- Periodicals; Social sciences -- Statistical methods -- Periodicals; 519.535
• DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2017.1304822
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1070-5511

Abstract

Abstract : With the increasing use of international survey data especially in cross-cultural and multinational studies, establishing measurement invariance (MI) across a large number of groups in a study is essential. Testing MI over many groups is methodologically challenging, however. We identified 5 methods for MI testing across many groups (multiple group confirmatory factor analysis, multilevel confirmatory factor analysis, multilevel factor mixture modeling, Bayesian approximate MI testing, and alignment optimization) and explicated the similarities and differences of these approaches in terms of their conceptual models and statistical procedures. A Monte Carlo study was conducted to investigate the efficacy of the 5 methods in detecting measurement noninvariance across many groups using various fit criteria. Generally, the 5 methods showed reasonable performance in identifying the level of invariance if an appropriate fit criterion was used (e.g., Bayesian information criteron with multilevel factor mixture modeling). Finally, general guidelines in selecting an appropriate method are provided.