Two degrees of freedom quasi-static EMG-force at the wrist using a minimum number of electrodes. (June 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Clancy, Edward A.; Martinez-Luna, Carlos; Wartenberg, Marek; Dai, Chenyun; Farrell, Todd R.
• Is Part Of: Journal of electromyography and kinesiology. Volume 34(2017:Jun.)
• Page Start: 24
• Page End: 36
• Publication Date: 2017-06
• Subjects: EMG -- EMG-force -- EMG signal processing -- Electromyogram -- Myoelectric control -- Prosthesis -- Prosthesis control; Electromyography -- Periodicals; Kinesiology -- Periodicals; Electromyography -- Periodicals; Movement -- physiology -- Periodicals; Muscles -- physiology -- Periodicals; Électromyographie -- Périodiques; Cinésiologie -- Périodiques; Electromyography; Kinesiology; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 616.740757
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2017.03.004
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1050-6411

Abstract

Abstract: Surface electromyogram-controlled powered hand/wrist prostheses return partial upper-limb function to limb-absent persons. Typically, one degree of freedom (DoF) is controlled at a time, with mode switching between DoFs. Recent research has explored using large-channel EMG systems to provide simultaneous, independent and proportional (SIP) control of two joints—but such systems are not practical in current commercial prostheses. Thus, we investigated site selection of a minimum number of conventional EMG electrodes in an EMG-force task, targeting four sites for a two DoF controller. In a laboratory experiment with 10 able-bodied subjects and three limb-absent subjects, 16 electrodes were placed about the proximal forearm. Subjects produced 1-DoF and 2-DoF slowly force-varying contractions up to 30% maximum voluntary contraction (MVC). EMG standard deviation was related to forces via regularized regression. Backward stepwise selection was used to retain those progressively fewer electrodes that exhibited minimum error. For 1-DoF models using two retained electrodes (which mimics the current state of the art), subjects had average RMS errors of (depending on the DoF): 7.1–9.5% MVC for able-bodied and 13.7–17.1% MVC for limb-absent subjects. For 2-DoF models, subjects using four electrodes had errors on 1-DoF trials of 6.7–8.5% MVC for able-bodied and 11.9–14.0% MVC for limb-absent; and errors on 2-DoF trials of 9.9–11.2% MVC for able-bodied and 15.8–16.7% MVC for limb-absent subjects. For each model, retaining more electrodes did not statistically improve performance. The able-bodied results suggest that backward selection is a viable method for minimum error selection of as few as four electrode sites for these EMG-force tasks. Performance evaluation in a prosthesis control task is a necessary and logical next step for this site selection method.