Microscopic and macroscopic infarct complicating pediatric epilepsy surgery. (23rd January 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rubinger, Luc; Hazrati, Lili‐Naz; Ahmed, Raheel; Rutka, James; Snead, Carter; Widjaja, Elysa
• Is Part Of: Epilepsia. Volume 58:issue 3(2017)
• Page Start: 393
• Page End: 401
• Publication Date: 2017-01-23
• Subjects: Pediatric epilepsy surgery -- Microscopic infarct -- Infarct -- Invasive monitoring -- Complications; Epilepsy -- Periodicals; 616.853
• DOI: 10.1111/epi.13667
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0013-9580

Abstract

Summary: Objective: There is some suggestion that microscopic infarct could be associated with invasive monitoring, but it is unclear if the microscopic infarct is also visible on imaging and associated with neurologic deficits. The aims of this study were to assess the rates of microscopic and macroscopic infarct and other major complications of pediatric epilepsy surgery, and to determine if these complications were higher following invasive monitoring. Methods: We reviewed the epilepsy surgery data from a tertiary pediatric center, and collected data on microscopic infarct on histology and macroscopic infarct on postoperative computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) done one day after surgery and major complications. Results: Three hundred fifty‐two patients underwent surgical resection and there was one death. Forty‐two percent had invasive monitoring. Thirty patients (9%) had microscopic infarct. Univariable analyses showed that microscopic infarct was higher among patients with invasive monitoring relative to no invasive monitoring (20% vs. 0.5%, respectively, p < 0.001). Eighteen patients (5%) had macroscopic infarct on CT or MRI. Univariable analysis showed no significant difference in macroscopic infarct between invasive monitoring and no invasive monitoring (8% vs. 3%, respectively, p = 0.085). One patient with microscopic infarct had transient right hemiparesis, and two with both macroscopic and microscopic infarct had unexpected persistent neurologic deficits. Thirty‐two major complications (9.1%) were reported, with no difference in major complications between invasive monitoring and no invasive monitoring (10% vs. 7%, p = 0.446). In the multivariable analysis, invasive monitoring increased the odds of microscopic infarct (odds ratio [OR] 15.87, p = 0.009), but not macroscopic infarct (OR 2.6, p = 0.173) or major complications (OR 1.4, p = 0.500), after adjusting for age at surgery, sex, age at seizure onset, operative type, and operative location. Significance: Microscopic infarct was associated with invasive monitoring, and none of the patients had permanent neurologic deficits. Macroscopic infarct was not associated with invasive monitoring, and two patients with macroscopic infarct had persistent neurologic deficits.