Rare ecomorphological convergence on a complex adaptive landscape: Body size and diet mediate evolution of jaw shape in squirrels (Sciuridae). (28th January 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Zelditch, Miriam Leah; Ye, Ji; Mitchell, Jonathan S.; Swiderski, Donald L.
• Is Part Of: Evolution. Volume 71:Number 3(2017)
• Page Start: 633
• Page End: 649
• Publication Date: 2017-01-28
• Subjects: Convergence -- diet evolution -- geometric morphometrics -- jaw morphology -- macroevolutionary adaptive landscape -- shape evolution; Evolution -- Periodicals; Heredity -- Periodicals; Évolution (Biologie) -- Périodiques; Hérédité -- Périodiques; 338.47004094
• DOI: 10.1111/evo.13168
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0014-3820

Abstract

Abstract : Convergence is widely regarded as compelling evidence for adaptation, often being portrayed as evidence that phenotypic outcomes are predictable from ecology, overriding contingencies of history. However, repeated outcomes may be very rare unless adaptive landscapes are simple, structured by strong ecological and functional constraints. One such constraint may be a limitation on body size because performance often scales with size, allowing species to adapt to challenging functions by modifying only size. When size is constrained, species might adapt by changing shape; convergent shapes may therefore be common when size is limiting and functions are challenging. We examine the roles of size and diet as determinants of jaw shape in Sciuridae. As expected, size and diet have significant interdependent effects on jaw shape and ecomorphological convergence is rare, typically involving demanding diets and limiting sizes. More surprising is morphological without ecological convergence, which is equally common between and within dietary classes. Those cases, like rare ecomorphological convergence, may be consequences of evolving on an adaptive landscape shaped by many‐to‐many relationships between ecology and function, many‐to‐one relationships between form and performance, and one‐to‐many relationships between functionally versatile morphologies and ecology. On complex adaptive landscapes, ecological selection can yield different outcomes.