Diagnostic Performance of Treadmill Exercise Cardiac Magnetic Resonance: The Prospective, Multicenter Exercise CMR's Accuracy for Cardiovascular Stress Testing (EXACT) Trial. Issue 8 (August 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Raman, Subha V.; Dickerson, Jennifer A.; Mazur, Wojciech; Wong, Timothy C.; B. Schelbert, Erik; Min, James K.; Scandling, Debbie; Bartone, Cheryl; Craft, Jason T.; Thavendiranathan, Paaladinesh; Mazzaferri, Ernest L.; Arnold, John W.; Gilkeson, Robert; Simonetti, Orlando P.
• Is Part Of: Journal of the American Heart Association. Volume 5:Issue 8(2016)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2016-08
• Subjects: coronary disease -- exercise -- ischemia -- magnetic resonance imaging -- stress; Heart -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Cardiovascular system -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Cerebrovascular disease -- Periodicals; Cardiology -- Periodicals; 616.1
• DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003811
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2047-9980

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Stress cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has typically involved pharmacologic agents. Treadmill CMR has shown utility in single‐center studies but has not undergone multicenter evaluation. Methods and Results: Patients referred for treadmill stress nuclear imaging (SPECT) were prospectively enrolled across 4 centers. After rest 99m Tc SPECT, patients underwent resting cine CMR. In‐room stress was then performed using an MR‐compatible treadmill with continuous 12‐lead electrocardiogram monitoring. At peak stress, 99m Tc was injected, and patients rapidly returned to the MR scanner isocenter for real‐time, free‐breathing stress cine and perfusion imaging. After recovery, cine and rest perfusion followed by late gadolinium enhancement acquisitions concluded CMR imaging. Stress SPECT was then acquired in adjacent nuclear laboratories. A subset of patients not referred for invasive coronary angiography within 2 weeks of stress underwent coronary computed tomography angiography. Angiographic data available in 94 patients showed sensitivity of 79%, specificity of 99% for exercise CMR with positive predictive value of 92% and negative predictive value of 96%. Agreement between treadmill stress CMR and angiography was strong (κ=0.82), and moderate between SPECT and angiography (κ=0.46) and CMR versus SPECT (κ=0.48). Conclusions: The multicenter EXACT trial indicates excellent diagnostic value of treadmill stress CMR in typical patients referred for exercise SPECT.