An evaluation of laparoscopic hysterectomy alone versus in combination with laparoscopic myomectomy for patients with uterine fibroids. (March 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- An evaluation of laparoscopic hysterectomy alone versus in combination with laparoscopic myomectomy for patients with uterine fibroids. (March 2017)
- Main Title:
- An evaluation of laparoscopic hysterectomy alone versus in combination with laparoscopic myomectomy for patients with uterine fibroids
- Authors:
- Taniguchi, Fumiaki
Koike, Natsuki
Kikukawa, Tadayuki
Yabuta, Maki
Yamaguchi, Masami
Adachi, Emi
Nakayama, Takeo - Abstract:
- Abstract: Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare surgical outcomes following conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) (C-LH) versus the combination method of LH plus laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) (LH + LM) for the treatment of large uterine fibroids. Study design: This study was performed in 56 patients (uterine weights ≥500 g) who underwent either C-LH or LH + LM performed by the same surgeon between May 2010 and May 2016. LH + LM was performed when C-LH was problematic because of poor visibility and/or mobility due to uterine fibroids. Results: The C-LH and LH + LM groups consisted of 27 (48%) and 29 (52%) patients, respectively. The clinical characteristics of patients differed significantly only in the median sizes of the dominant fibroid. The sizes of the dominant fibroid in the C-LH and LH + LM groups were 9.5 cm and 10.7 cm (P = 0.04), respectively. Regarding the surgical outcomes for the C-LH and LH + LM groups, the median uterine weights were 558 g and 737 g (P = 0.03), respectively, the median operating times were 156 min and 173 min (P = 0.23), respectively, and the median intraoperative blood losses were 150 g and 300 g (P = 0.0004), respectively. In all patients, LH was performed without conversion to laparotomy and there were no cases of bladder, ureteral, or gastrointestinal tract injury. There were no postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo scale ≥ III in either group. Conclusions: When C-LH cannot be performed because of large uterineAbstract: Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare surgical outcomes following conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) (C-LH) versus the combination method of LH plus laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) (LH + LM) for the treatment of large uterine fibroids. Study design: This study was performed in 56 patients (uterine weights ≥500 g) who underwent either C-LH or LH + LM performed by the same surgeon between May 2010 and May 2016. LH + LM was performed when C-LH was problematic because of poor visibility and/or mobility due to uterine fibroids. Results: The C-LH and LH + LM groups consisted of 27 (48%) and 29 (52%) patients, respectively. The clinical characteristics of patients differed significantly only in the median sizes of the dominant fibroid. The sizes of the dominant fibroid in the C-LH and LH + LM groups were 9.5 cm and 10.7 cm (P = 0.04), respectively. Regarding the surgical outcomes for the C-LH and LH + LM groups, the median uterine weights were 558 g and 737 g (P = 0.03), respectively, the median operating times were 156 min and 173 min (P = 0.23), respectively, and the median intraoperative blood losses were 150 g and 300 g (P = 0.0004), respectively. In all patients, LH was performed without conversion to laparotomy and there were no cases of bladder, ureteral, or gastrointestinal tract injury. There were no postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo scale ≥ III in either group. Conclusions: When C-LH cannot be performed because of large uterine fibroids that cause poor visibility and/or mobility, LH + LM may allow the procedure to be successfully completed without conversion to laparotomy. However, the latter approach increases the risk for intraoperative blood loss. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology. Volume 210(2017)
- Journal:
- European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology
- Issue:
- Volume 210(2017)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 210, Issue 2017 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 210
- Issue:
- 2017
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0210-2017-0000
- Page Start:
- 132
- Page End:
- 138
- Publication Date:
- 2017-03
- Subjects:
- Fibroids -- Laparoscopy -- Hysterectomy -- Myomectomy -- Visibility -- Mobility
Obstetrics -- Periodicals
Gynecology -- Periodicals
Reproductive health -- Periodicals
Gynecology -- Periodicals
Obstetrics -- Periodicals
Reproduction -- Periodicals
Obstétrique -- Périodiques
Gynécologie -- Périodiques
Reproduction -- Périodiques
Verloskunde
Gynaecologie
Voortplanting (biologie)
Gynecology
Obstetrics
Reproduction
Electronic journals
Periodicals
Electronic journals
618.05 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03012115 ↗
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/els/00282243 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/03012115 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/03012115 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.12.005 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0301-2115
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3829.733000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 428.xml