Evaluating the efficacy of fully automated approaches for the selection of eyeblink ICA components. (13th February 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Pontifex, Matthew B.; Miskovic, Vladimir; Laszlo, Sarah
• Is Part Of: Psychophysiology. Volume 54:Number 5(2017:May)
• Page Start: 780
• Page End: 791
• Publication Date: 2017-02-13
• Subjects: Independent component analysis -- EEG artifact -- EEGLAB; Psychophysiology -- Periodicals; 612.8
• DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12827
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0048-5772

Abstract

Abstract: Independent component analysis (ICA) offers a powerful approach for the isolation and removal of eyeblink artifacts from EEG signals. Manual identification of the eyeblink ICA component by inspection of scalp map projections, however, is prone to error, particularly when nonartifactual components exhibit topographic distributions similar to the blink. The aim of the present investigation was to determine the extent to which automated approaches for selecting eyeblink‐related ICA components could be utilized to replace manual selection. We evaluated popular blink selection methods relying on spatial features (EyeCatch), combined stereotypical spatial and temporal features (ADJUST), and a novel method relying on time series features alone (icablinkmetrics) using both simulated and real EEG data. The results of this investigation suggest that all three methods of automatic component selection are able to accurately identify eyeblink‐related ICA components at or above the level of trained human observers. However, icablinkmetrics, in particular, appears to provide an effective means of automating ICA artifact rejection while at the same time eliminating human errors inevitable during manual component selection and false positive component identifications common in other automated approaches. Based upon these findings, best practices for (a) identifying artifactual components via automated means, and (b) reducing the accidental removal of signal‐related ICA components are discussed.