Do the hydrological responses to forest disturbances in large watersheds vary along climatic gradients in the interior of British Columbia, Canada?. Issue 2 (March 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Zhang, Mingfang; Wei, Xiaohua; Li, Qiang
• Other Names: Wei Xiaohua guestEditor.; Winkler Rita guestEditor.; Sun Ge guestEditor.
• Is Part Of: Ecohydrology. Volume 10:Issue 2(2017)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2017-03
• Subjects: aridity index -- climatic gradient -- forest disturbances -- hydrological response; Ecohydrology -- Periodicals; Hydrology -- Periodicals; Water -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals; 577.6
• DOI: 10.1002/eco.1840
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1936-0584

Abstract

Abstract: Hydrological responses to forest disturbances are highly variable among watersheds. Climatic factors including water and energy are major drivers that determine the hydrological responses to forest disturbances. Although there are a number of large watershed studies on identifying the role of climate in the hydrological response to forest disturbances (e.g., logging, insect infestation, and fire), they are mainly concentrated on the precipitation effect. Given that climatic factors including both water and energy interact dynamically with hydrology and forest, and accordingly with forest–water relationships, there is a need for understanding the joint controls of water and energy on hydrological responses to forest changes by use of an integrated climatic index. In this study, 6 large watersheds along climatic gradients (Willow, Cottonwood, Baker, Moffat, Tulameen, and Ashnola) in the interior of British Columbia (BC), Canada, were selected for investigating the effect of climate on hydrological responses to forest disturbances at a large watershed scale by using modified double mass curves and statistical analysis (time series cross‐correlation, linear regression, and Mann–Whitney U test). Key results include the following: (a) in watersheds with a cumulative equivalent clear‐cut area of over 30% (Willow, Baker, Moffat, and Tulameen), mean annual flows were significantly increased by about 21–60 mm due to cumulated forest disturbances and (b) mean annual flow response to forest disturbances varied along climatic gradient. The amount of mean annual flow increase due to forest disturbances in energy‐limited watersheds Willow and Tulameen was as 3 times as that in water‐limited watersheds Baker and Moffat. Similarly, mean annual flow changes due to forest disturbances in wetter years were greater than those in drier years as suggested by results from the study watersheds. These findings highlight the need to develop different strategies for forests management in water‐limited and energy‐limited watersheds to minimize or adapt hydrological changes due to forest disturbances.