Archival orthodoxy of post-custodial realities for digital records in South Africa. Issue 1 (2nd January 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ngoepe, Mpho
• Is Part Of: Archives and manuscripts. Volume 45:Issue 1(2017)
• Page Start: 31
• Page End: 44
• Publication Date: 2017-01-02
• Subjects: Digital records -- post-custodial -- South Africa -- archival legislation -- preservation; Archives -- Periodicals; Archives -- Australia -- Periodicals; Public records -- Management -- Periodicals; Public records -- Australia -- Periodicals; Periodicals; 025
• DOI: 10.1080/01576895.2016.1277361
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0157-6895

Abstract

Abstract: Some public entities in South Africa have implemented digital records systems over a period of 20 years. In terms of the South African archival legal framework, there is a need for such entities to transfer the records into archival custody. However, there is consensus among researchers that there is no infrastructure to ingest digital records into archival custody in South Africa. Furthermore, some public entities have migrated from one system to another since implementation and there is a possibility that records might have been lost during migration. This study demonstrates through literature review the unconscious archival orthodoxy of post-custodial realities in South Africa. The study recommends that public entities should apply for exemption from archival legislation in order to develop an interim solution for the preservation of digital records. The National Archives and Records Service of South Africa (NARSSA) is also encouraged to develop a policy on distributed custody to allow government entities to create interim solutions for preserving digital records. Both public entities and NARSSA should invest in capacity development, including training and provision of sustainable infrastructure required to preserve digital records. It is hoped that this study will influence policy-making with regard to custody of digital records.