Comparative life cycle assessment of thermal residue recycling on a regional scale: A case study of South-East Finland. (15th April 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Deviatkin, Ivan; Havukainen, Jouni; Horttanainen, Mika
• Is Part Of: Journal of cleaner production. Volume 149(2017)
• Page Start: 275
• Page End: 289
• Publication Date: 2017-04-15
• Subjects: Life cycle assessment -- Bottom ash -- Fly ash -- Circular economy -- Waste management -- Systems analysis; Factory and trade waste -- Management -- Periodicals; Manufactures -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals; Déchets industriels -- Gestion -- Périodiques; Usines -- Aspect de l'environnement -- Périodiques; 628.5
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.087
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0959-6526

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of the study was to quantify the environmental impact of four alternative recycling methods of thermal residues generated within the case study area chosen. Overall, 90 combinations of 13 scenarios were included in the study and a sensitivity analysis was performed. The recycling methods that were assessed included forest fertilization and neutralization, landfill construction, road construction, and road stabilization. Other scenarios focused on the regional optimization, distribution of heavy metals under L/S ratio 10 L kg − 1, and uncertainty related to the determination of heavy metals at levels that were lower than the analytical limits of quantification. The alternative scenarios were studied using a comparative life cycle assessment method with the system expansion. The results indicated the extent to which each recycling method was superior to landfilling within non-toxic impact categories, with the average reduction in the environmental impact being 10–30% when the residues were utilized for forest fertilization, road construction, and stabilization, and by 3–12% when the residues were utilized for landfill construction. The majority of the impact resulted from avoiding the need to landfill the residues since this could be achieved even at a zero substitution rate in the majority of the cases. In terms of the toxic impact categories, the use of the residues for road construction purposes had a more positive impact on the environment that the alternative uses, resulting in a reduced ecotoxicity potential and carcinogenic human toxicity potentials of 30% and 40% respectively, and an increase in non-carcinogenic human toxicity potential of only 4%. Most of the toxic impact was the result of Ba, V, Sb, Co, Cr, and Zn leaching. In addition, the study concluded that a lack of the leaching data below the limits of quantification was significant for the overall toxic results of the study. Highlights: Comparative LCA was performed to assess 90 combinations of 13 scenarios, including 4 methods of thermal residues recycling. Forest fertilization, road construction, or road stabilization with thermal residues reduced environmental impact by 10–30%. Lime substitution with fly ash for soil stabilization resulted in the largest global warming potential reduction of 74%. Commercial fertilizer and limestone substitution with thermal residues reduced the resource depletion potential by 93%. Utilization of fly ash in road construction had the least toxic impact on the environment.