A research coding method for the basic patient-centered interview. Issue 3 (March 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Grayson-Sneed, Katelyn A.; Smith, Sandi W.; Smith, Robert C.
• Is Part Of: Patient education and counseling. Volume 100:Issue 3(2017)
• Page Start: 518
• Page End: 525
• Publication Date: 2017-03
• Subjects: Patient-centered interviewing research -- Patient-centered interview -- Interview rating; Patient education -- Periodicals; Health counseling -- Periodicals; Health education -- Periodicals; Counseling -- Periodicals; Patient Education -- Periodicals; Éducation des patients -- Périodiques; Counseling -- Périodiques; Éducation sanitaire -- Périodiques; 615.5071
• DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.10.003
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0738-3991

Abstract

Highlights: Efficient, reliable, and valid rating checklist for patient-centeredness. Based on evidence-based patient-centered method. Refined and shortened from prior valid rating procedure. Non-professionals can be trained to use. Applies in both research and teaching. Abstract: Objective: To develop a more reliable coding method of medical interviewing focused on data-gathering and emotion-handling. Methods: Two trained (30 h) undergraduates rated videotaped interviews from 127 resident-simulated patient (SP) interactions. Trained on 45 videotapes, raters coded 25 of 127 study set tapes for patient-centeredness. Guetzkow's U, Cohen's Kappa, and percent of agreement were used to measure raters' reliability in unitizing and coding residents' skills for eliciting: agenda (3 yes/no items), physical story (2), personal story (6), emotional story (15), using indirect skills (4), and general patient-centeredness (3). Results: 45 items were dichotomized from the earlier, Likert scale-based method and were reduced to 33 during training. Guetzkow's U ranged from 0.00 to 0.087. Kappa ranged from 0.86 to 1.00 for the 6 variables and 33 individual items. The overall kappa was 0.90, and percent of agreement was 97.5%. Percent of agreement by item ranged from 84 to 100%. Conclusions: A simple, highly reliable coding method, weighted (by no. of items) to highlight personal elements of an interview, was developed and is recommended as a criterion standard research coding method. Practice implications: An easily conducted, reliable coding procedure can be the basis for everyday questionnaires like patient satisfaction with patient-centeredness.