Costs and benefits of self-efficacy: Differences of the stress response and clinical implications. (April 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Schönfeld, P.; Preusser, F.; Margraf, J.
• Is Part Of: Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews. Volume 75(2017)
• Page Start: 40
• Page End: 52
• Publication Date: 2017-04
• Subjects: Self-efficacy -- Stress -- Stress response -- Autonomic arousal -- Negative effects -- Performance -- Mental health; Psychophysiology -- Periodicals; Human behavior -- Periodicals; Animal behavior -- Periodicals; Neurology -- Periodicals; Behavior -- Periodicals; Ethology -- Periodicals; Neurology -- Periodicals; Psychophysiologie -- Périodiques; Comportement humain -- Périodiques; Animaux -- Mœurs et comportement -- Périodiques; Neurologie -- Périodiques; Animal behavior; Human behavior; Neurology; Psychophysiology; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 573.8
• DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.01.031
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0149-7634

Abstract

Highlights: Self-efficacy is crucial for neuroendocrine and psychological reactivity of stress. Evidence for protective effects of self-efficacy has a broad scope. The role of self-efficacy is however heterogeneous. It can also increase autonomic responses, decrease performance and diminish mental health. Experimental research and interventions aimed at promotion are reflected critically. Abstract: Encounters with stressors induce diverse idiosyncratic neuroendocrine, behavioral and psychological reactions across people. Perceived self-efficacy can alter autonomic responses and their effects on mental health. The beneficial effects of self-efficacy in buffering physiological arousal, enhancing performance, and diminishing psychopathological symptoms have been observed in diverse contexts. We show that the role of self-efficacy is not uniformly beneficial, and that higher levels of self-efficacy can sometimes lead to increases in neuroendocrine and psychological stress responses and decreases in performance, a phenomenon that has been widely neglected. We discuss specific conditions under which self-efficacy effects do not uniformly ameliorate or prevent the consequences of stress. These conditions suggest that therapeutic interventions need not always promote self-efficacy in principal. Simultaneously, they to do suggest that keeping self-efficacy high might be disadvantageous or detrimental.