Linear and non-linear wall friction of wet foams. Issue 2 (11th November 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Le Merrer, Marie; Lespiat, Rémi; Höhler, Reinhard; Cohen-Addad, Sylvie
• Is Part Of: Soft matter. Volume 11:Issue 2(2015)
• Page Start: 368
• Page End: 381
• Publication Date: 2014-11-11
• Subjects: Soft condensed matter -- Periodicals; 530.413
• DOI: 10.1039/c4sm01557f
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1744-683X

Abstract

Abstract : Wall slip of bubble monolayers and wet 3D foams exhibits linear or non-linear friction depending on the capillary number and confinement. Abstract : We study the wall slip of aqueous foams with a high liquid content. We use a set-up where, driven by buoyancy, a foam creeps along an inclined smooth solid wall which is immersed in the foaming solution. This configuration allows the force driving the bubble motion and the bubble confinement in the vicinity of the wall to be tuned independently. First, we consider bubble monolayers with small Bond number Bo < 1 and measure the relation between the friction force F and the bubble velocity V . For bubbles which are so small that they are almost spherical, the friction law F ∝ V is Stokes-like. The analysis shows that the minimal thickness of the lubricating contact between the bubble and the wall is governed by DLVO long-range forces. Our results are the first evidence of this predicted linear friction regime for creeping bubbles. Due to buoyancy, large bubbles flatten against the wall. In this case, dissipation arises because of viscous flow in the dynamic meniscus between the contact film and the spherical part of the bubble. It leads to a non-linear Bretherton-like friction law F ∝ V 2/3, as expected for slipping bubbles with mobile liquid–gas interfaces. The Stokes-like friction dominates for capillary numbers Ca larger than the crossover value Ca* ∼ Bo 3/2 . The overall friction force can be expressed as the sum of these two contributions. On this basis, we then study 3D foams close to the jamming transition with osmotic pressures Π small compared to the capillary pressure P c . We measure the wall shear stress τ as a function of the capillary number, and we evidence two friction regimes that are consistent with those found for the monolayer. Similarly to this latter case, the total shear stress can be expressed as the sum of the Stokes-like friction term τ ∝ Ca and the Bretherton-like one τ ∝ Ca 2/3 . However, for a 3D foam, the crossover at a capillary number Ca** between both regimes is governed by the ratio of the osmotic pressure to the capillary pressure, such that Ca** ∼ ( Π / P c ) 3/2 .