Shorter anogenital and anoscrotal distances correlate with the severity of hypospadias: A prospective study. Issue 1 (February 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Cox, K.; Kyriakou, A.; Amjad, B.; O'Toole, S.; Flett, M.E.; Welsh, M.; Ahmed, S.F.; Cascio, S.
• Is Part Of: Journal of pediatric urology. Volume 13:Issue 1(2017)
• Page Start: 57.e1
• Page End: 57.e5
• Publication Date: 2017-02
• Subjects: Androgen -- Disorders of sex development -- Genitalia -- Masculinization programming window; Pediatric urology -- Periodicals; Urologic Diseases -- Periodicals; Urogenital Diseases -- Periodicals; Urologic Surgical Procedures -- Periodicals; Child; Infant; Urologie pédiatrique -- Périodiques; Appareil urinaire -- Maladies -- Périodiques; Pédiatrie; Urologie; Pediatric urology; Périodique électronique (Descripteur de forme); Ressource Internet (Descripteur de forme); Electronic journals; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 618.926
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.08.006
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1477-5131

Abstract

Summary: Introduction: Anogenital distance (AGD) is a recognised marker of in utero androgen action. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between severity of hypospadias and AGD. Study design: Boys undergoing hypospadias repair in a single tertiary centre between May 2012 and February 16 were included in the study. Anogenital distance was measured from the centre of the anus to the base of the penis, and anoscrotal distance (ASD) from the centre of the anus to the junction between the smooth perineal skin and scrotal skin. Trained paediatric urologists made all measurements using digital callipers. Results: Fifty-nine boys with hypospadias and 31 age-matched controls undergoing circumcision (median age 1.37 years, range 1.01–1.96) had AGD and ASD measured under anaesthetic. The patients were divided into two groups, according to hypospadias severity: group 1 – distal penile/subcoronal/glandular ( n = 40); and group 2 – perineal/penoscrotal/midshaft ( n = 19). The median AGD for controls was 74.0 mm (range 53.2–87.8) and for hypospadias it was 72.3 mm (range 50.7–90.0) ( P = 0.816). The median ASD for controls was 42.3 mm (range 31.0–56.1) and for hypospadias it was 39.4 mm (range 20.7–77.0) ( P = 0.224). Considering severity of hypospadias, the median AGD for group 1 and group 2 was 73.7 mm (range 50.7–90.0) and 63.3 mm (range 53.6–77.0), respectively ( P < 0.001). The median ASD was also higher in group 1, at 41.3 mm (range 20.7–65.0), compared to 35.2 mm (range 23.5–77.0) in group 2 ( P = 0.119) (Summary Fig.). Discussion: This study showed that more severe forms of hypospadias are associated with shorter AGD and ASD. These findings agree with two previous studies that identified reduced AGD in boys with hypospadias. However, these studies did not investigate an association with severity of hypospadias. As hypospadias is multifactorial, only a small proportion of cases are thought to be associated with impaired in utero androgen exposure. The shorter AGD in boys with severe hypospadias compared with mild hypospadias would indicate that AGD is a marker of the severity of androgen production. This may also suggest that less severe forms of hypospadias have a different aetiology involving a later stage of development, and that they are not the result of reduced androgen exposure in the male programming window between the 8–14 weeks gestation. Conclusion: This study identified that boys with more severe hypospadias are more likely to have a shorter AGD and ASD than boys with mild hypospadias. This may indicate that there is a more profound impairment of in utero androgen action in severe hypospadias. Summary Fig. Anogenital and anoscrotal distances according to hypospadias severity. AGD, anogenital distance; ASD, anoscrotal distance. Mild = glandular, coronal or distal penile hypospadias; Severe = mid-shaft, penoscrotal or perineal hypospadias. *Severely shorter compared with mild, P < 0.001. ˄Severe trend towards being shorter compared with mild, P = 0.119.