Less research on tuberculosis than HIV and malaria when research agendas are poorly coordinated: a systematic review of research outputs from Cambodia. (March 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Khan, Mishal; James, Richard; Sundaram, Neisha; Wu, Shishi; Eang, Mao Tang; Vonthanak, Saphonn; Coker, Richard
• Is Part Of: International journal of infectious diseases. Volume 56(2017:Mar.)
• Page Start: 25
• Page End: 29
• Publication Date: 2017-03
• Subjects: Tuberculosis -- HIV -- Malaria -- Funding -- Policy -- Review; Communicable diseases -- Periodicals; Communicable Diseases -- Periodicals; Communicable diseases; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 616.9
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2016.11.417
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1201-9712

Abstract

Highlights: This scoping review analysing trends in research into HIV, malaria, and tuberculosis (TB) in Cambodia, revealed that there is much less evidence to inform policy decisions from TB research than from HIV or malaria research. Considering that TB causes more deaths in Cambodia than HIV and malaria, the review findings suggest that an increase in TB research may be needed. To ensure that future research addresses critical information gaps for policy decisions, a coherent research strategy could be developed by a national committee supported by the donor and research community. Summary: Objective: Coordination of health interventions and research is often weak during periods of political transition and unprecedented aid inflows, which Cambodia has recently experienced. Although HIV, tuberculosis (TB), and malaria have been a focus of international funding, TB has received much less. This study compares the numbers and methodologies of studies conducted on TB, malaria, and HIV in Cambodia, identifying evidence gaps and future research needs. Methods: Three electronic databases and the grey literature were searched for studies on HIV, TB, and malaria published between January 2000 and October 2015. Information about the disease focus and methodology was extracted from the studies included. Results: A total of 2581 unique studies were screened and 712 were included in the analysis. The results of this review demonstrated that despite increasing numbers of publications, there have been fewer studies on TB (16%) than HIV (43%) and malaria (41%). Observational epidemiological studies outnumbered other methodologies (44%) for all three diseases. Conclusions: Despite substantial investments, important research areas appear to have been neglected in Cambodia; specifically, studies on TB and studies involving economic, qualitative, interventional, and genomics methods. The inter-disease disparity in published research in Cambodia identified, considered alongside disease burden, suggests that an increase in TB research may be needed to inform control strategies.