How do frequent users of crisis helplines differ from other users regarding their reasons for calling? Results from a survey with callers to Lifeline, Australia's national crisis helpline service. (15th November 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Middleton, Aves; Woodward, Alan; Gunn, Jane; Bassilios, Bridget; Pirkis, Jane
• Is Part Of: Health & social care in the community. Volume 25:Number 3(2017)
• Page Start: 1041
• Page End: 1049
• Publication Date: 2016-11-15
• Subjects: crisis helplines -- crisis resolution -- frequent users -- health service research -- survey research; Public welfare -- Periodicals; Community health services -- Periodicals; Human services -- Periodicals; 362.1
• DOI: 10.1111/hsc.12404
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0966-0410

Abstract

Abstract: Crisis helplines are designed to provide short‐term support to people in an immediate crisis. However, there is a group of users who call crisis helplines frequently over an extended period of time. The reasons for their ongoing use remain unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in the reasons for calling between frequent and other users of crisis helplines. This was achieved by examining the findings from a brief survey completed by callers to Lifeline Australia at the end of their call between February and July 2015. In the survey, callers reported on their socio‐demographics, reasons for their current call and number of calls made in the past month. Survey respondents were categorised as frequent, episodic and one‐off users, and analyses were conducted using ordered logistic regression. Three hundred and fifteen callers completed the survey, which represented 57% of eligible callers. Twenty‐two per cent reported calling 20 times or more in the past month (frequent users), 51% reported calling between 2 and 19 times (episodic users) and 25% reported calling once (one‐off users). Two per cent were unable to recall the number of calls they made in the past month. Frequent users reported similar reasons for calling as other users but they were more likely to call regularly to talk about their feelings [OR = 6.0; 95% CI: 3.7–9.8]. This pattern of service use is at odds with the current model of care offered by crisis helplines which is designed to provide one‐off support. There is a need to investigate further the factors that drive frequent users to call crisis helplines regularly.