Dealing with Cumulative Biodiversity Impacts in Strategic Environmental Assessment: A New Frontier for Conservation Planning. Issue 2 (14th June 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Whitehead, Amy L.; Kujala, Heini; Wintle, Brendan A.
• Is Part Of: Conservation letters. Volume 10:Issue 2(2017:Mar./Apr.)
• Page Start: 195
• Page End: 204
• Publication Date: 2016-06-14
• Subjects: Spatial conservation prioritization -- conservation planning -- biodiversity -- development -- strategic environmental assessment -- cumulative impact assessment -- species distribution model -- irreplaceability -- complementarity; Biodiversity conservation -- Periodicals; Biodiversity -- Monitoring -- Periodicals; 333.9516
• DOI: 10.1111/conl.12260
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1755-263X

Abstract

Abstract: Biodiversity impact assessments under threatened species legislation often focus on individual development proposals at a single location, usually for a single species, leading to inadequate assessments of multiple impacts that accumulate over large spatial scales for multiple species. Regulations requiring ad‐hoc assessments can lead to "death by a thousand cuts, " where biodiversity is degraded by many small impacts that individually do not appear to threaten species' persistence. Spatial prioritization methods can improve the efficiency of decision‐making by explicitly considering cumulative impacts of multiple proposed developments on multiple species over large spatial scales. We present an assessment approach and a unique case study in which spatial prioritization tools were used to support strategic assessment of a large development plan in Western Australia. The application of the approach helped identify relatively minor alterations to development plans that resulted in reductions in biodiversity impacts and informed expansion of the protected area network. Using these tools to assess trade‐offs between conservation and development will help identify planning footprints that minimize biodiversity losses.