Mini C‐arm: faster, cheaper, safer?. Issue 4 (30th November 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Mini C‐arm: faster, cheaper, safer?. Issue 4 (30th November 2016)
- Main Title:
- Mini C‐arm: faster, cheaper, safer?
- Authors:
- Gieroba, Tom J.
Williams, Nicole
Antoniou, Georgia
Cundy, Peter J. - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background: Mini C‐arm image intensifiers (IIs) are promoted to permit lower radiation dose than traditional IIs with a lower purchase price and without the need for a radiographer, saving time. In real‐world usage, radiation dose is not always lower. Methods: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data for 620 children undergoing forearm fracture reduction in theatre was undertaken. Imaging was performed with the Fluoroscan mini C‐arm or a comparison traditional II. Radiation dose and theatre time were recorded. Results: There was no significant difference in radiation dose as measured by dose‐area product (0.013 versus 0.014 Gy.cm 2, P = 0.22). We noted an inverse association between operator experience and radiation dose. The mini C‐arm allowed a shorter procedure time (26 versus 30 min, P < 0.001) and theatre time (13 versus 16 min, P < 0.001). Re‐displacement rates were similar (1.3 versus 2.2%). The Fluoroscan is AU$120 000 cheaper to purchase and AU$35 283 cheaper to run per year than the comparison II. Consultants had a 14% lower dose‐area product (0.012 versus 0.014 Gy.cm 2, P < 0.001) and 18% shorter screening time (8 versus 9.8 s, P < 0.001) than registrars. Conclusion: The Fluoroscan mini C‐arm II does not demonstrate a radiation saving during closed reductions of paediatric forearm fractures but allows shorter procedures and theatre time with similar re‐displacement rates. The purchase price is lower than a traditional II. We noted thatAbstract : Background: Mini C‐arm image intensifiers (IIs) are promoted to permit lower radiation dose than traditional IIs with a lower purchase price and without the need for a radiographer, saving time. In real‐world usage, radiation dose is not always lower. Methods: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data for 620 children undergoing forearm fracture reduction in theatre was undertaken. Imaging was performed with the Fluoroscan mini C‐arm or a comparison traditional II. Radiation dose and theatre time were recorded. Results: There was no significant difference in radiation dose as measured by dose‐area product (0.013 versus 0.014 Gy.cm 2, P = 0.22). We noted an inverse association between operator experience and radiation dose. The mini C‐arm allowed a shorter procedure time (26 versus 30 min, P < 0.001) and theatre time (13 versus 16 min, P < 0.001). Re‐displacement rates were similar (1.3 versus 2.2%). The Fluoroscan is AU$120 000 cheaper to purchase and AU$35 283 cheaper to run per year than the comparison II. Consultants had a 14% lower dose‐area product (0.012 versus 0.014 Gy.cm 2, P < 0.001) and 18% shorter screening time (8 versus 9.8 s, P < 0.001) than registrars. Conclusion: The Fluoroscan mini C‐arm II does not demonstrate a radiation saving during closed reductions of paediatric forearm fractures but allows shorter procedures and theatre time with similar re‐displacement rates. The purchase price is lower than a traditional II. We noted that operator experience reduces radiation dose. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- ANZ journal of surgery. Volume 87:Issue 4(2017)
- Journal:
- ANZ journal of surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 87:Issue 4(2017)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 87, Issue 4 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 87
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0087-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- 282
- Page End:
- 286
- Publication Date:
- 2016-11-30
- Subjects:
- bone -- cast -- fluoroscopy -- forearm injury -- fracture -- manipulation -- orthopaedic -- surgical
Surgery -- Periodicals
617.005 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1111/ans.13842 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1445-1433
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 1566.878000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 352.xml