Clinical and Serological Dynamics of Besnoitia besnoiti Infection in Three Endemically Infected Beef Cattle Herds. Issue 2 (24th August 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Gutiérrez‐Expósito, D.; Ortega‐Mora, L. M.; García‐Lunar, P.; Rojo‐Montejo, S.; Zabala, J.; Serrano, M.; Alvarez‐García, G.
• Is Part Of: Transboundary and emerging diseases. Volume 64:Issue 2(2017)
• Page Start: 538
• Page End: 546
• Publication Date: 2015-08-24
• Subjects: Besnoitia besnoiti -- longitudinal study -- beef cattle -- endemic infection -- clinical signs -- serology; Veterinary medicine -- Periodicals; 636.089
• DOI: 10.1111/tbed.12402
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1865-1674

Abstract

Summary: The dynamics of bovine besnoitiosis were studied in an area where the disease is endemic. A four‐year longitudinal study was conducted for the first time in three infected beef cattle herds located in the Urbasa‐Andía Mountains (Navarra, Spain). Each herd was visited four to seven times, and clinical and serological prevalence rates and incidence rates were estimated. Clinical inspections to identify compatible clinical signs with the disease stages were conducted at the beginning and end of the study. Serological assessment was initially performed by ELISA. Seronegative animals with clinical signs and seropositive animals with relative index per cent (RIPC) values lower than 30 that did not increase during the study period were analysed by Western blot to optimize the sensitivity and specificity of the ELISA test. Clinical prevalence rates were slightly higher (62% on average) than the seroprevalence rates (50% on average), and tissue cysts located in the vestibulum vaginae and sclera were the most frequently detected clinical signs. The proportion of seropositive animals with clinical signs varied from 16.7% to 73.6% among the herds, and 17% of cattle with clinical signs proved to be seronegative by both serological tests. An average 22% serological incidence rate was also reported in addition to clinical incidence rates that varied from 12.5% to 16.7%. Additionally, parasitemia was investigated in the herd that showed the highest clinical and seroprevalence rates. Only one PCR positive blood sample was detected. Thus, the role that blood may play in parasite transmission needs to be further investigated. Infected herds maintained both high prevalence and incidence rates in the absence of control measures and a high number of parasite carriers. Finally, economic impact studies on reproductive and productive losses associated with besnoitiosis need to be performed to implement a cost–benefit control programme.