Behind the scenes: How visual memory load biases selective attention during processing of visual streams. (9th September 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Klaver, Peter; Talsma, Durk
• Is Part Of: Psychophysiology. Volume 50:Number 11(2013:Nov.)
• Page Start: 1133
• Page End: 1146
• Publication Date: 2013-09-09
• Subjects: Attention -- Working memory -- Contingent capture -- EEG/ERP; Psychophysiology -- Periodicals; 612.8
• DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12126
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0048-5772

Abstract

Abstract: We recorded ERPs to investigate whether the visual memory load can bias visual selective attention. Participants memorized one or four letters and then responded to memory‐matching letters presented in a relevant color while ignoring distractor letters or letters in an irrelevant color. Stimuli in the relevant color elicited larger frontal selection positivities (FSP) and occipital selection negativities (OSN) compared to irrelevant color stimuli. Only distractors elicited a larger FSP in the high than in the low memory load task. Memory load prolonged the OSN for all letters. Response mapping complexity was also modulated but did not affect the FSP and OSN. Together, the FSP data suggest that high memory load increased distractability. The OSN data suggest that memory load sustained attention to letters in a relevant color until working memory processing was completed, independently of whether the letters were in working memory or not.