Hydrodynamic processes and sediment erosion mechanisms in an open channel bend of strong curvature with deformed bathymetry. Issue 2 (24th April 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Constantinescu, G.; Kashyap, S.; Tokyay, T.; Rennie, C. D.; Townsend, R. D.
• Is Part Of: Journal of geophysical research. Volume 118:Issue 2(2013:Jun.)
• Page Start: 480
• Page End: 496
• Publication Date: 2013-04-24
• Subjects: open channels -- river bends -- river erosion -- large eddy simulation -- coherent structures -- turbulence; Geomorphology -- Periodicals; 551.3
• DOI: 10.1002/jgrf.20042
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2169-9003

Abstract

Abstract: [1] Most rivers exhibit regions of strong channel curvature that are characterized by more complex and variable flow and erosion patterns, compared to regions of lower curvature. Studies investigating high‐curvature bends using eddy‐resolving techniques have been limited, and the effect of bend angle on flow and erosion has rarely been investigated. This study investigates flow in a 135° nonerodible bank open channel bend of high curvature: ratio of radius of curvature, R, to channel width, B, is 1.5. The bathymetry is obtained during the final stages of a clear water scour experiment. Large Eddy Simulation is used to investigate the effect of secondary flow on the redistribution of streamwise momentum, the details of coherent structures, and mechanisms leading to erosion within the bend. Results are compared with those from a similar numerical study of a 193° sharply curved open channel bend with R / B = 1.35. The angle of the 135° bend is representative of typical regular meander geometry, while the larger angle of the 193° bend is representative of a tortuous meander geometry. The different bathymetries induced important quantitative and qualitative differences in the vortical and turbulence structure within the open channel for the two cases. Inner bank streamwise‐oriented vortical (SOV) cells formed in both cases, but the position and extent of shear layers forming between regions of fast and slow moving fluid differed, and flow did not separate at the inner bank in the 135° bend. An outer‐bank cell was observed in the 135° bend, but not in the 193° bend. Distributions of predicted boundary shear stresses indicated the capacity of the flow to erode the outer bank of a sharply curved bend under two representative regimes found in the field. Key Points: Mechanisms leading to erosion in river bends Numerical modeling of river flows Coherent structures in high curvature river channels