A Simulation Study of Polychoric Instrumental Variable Estimation in Structural Equation Models. Issue 5 (2nd September 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Jin, Shaobo; Luo, Hao; Yang-Wallentin, Fan
• Is Part Of: Structural equation modeling. Volume 23:Issue 5(2016)
• Page Start: 680
• Page End: 694
• Publication Date: 2016-09-02
• Subjects: factor analysis -- model misspecification -- ordinal data -- robustness; Multivariate analysis -- Periodicals; Social sciences -- Statistical methods -- Periodicals; 519.535
• DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2016.1189334
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1070-5511

Abstract

Abstract : Data collected from questionnaires are often in ordinal scale. Unweighted least squares (ULS), diagonally weighted least squares (DWLS) and normal-theory maximum likelihood (ML) are commonly used methods to fit structural equation models. Consistency of these estimators demands no structural misspecification. In this article, we conduct a simulation study to compare the equation-by-equation polychoric instrumental variable (PIV) estimation with ULS, DWLS, and ML. Accuracy of PIV for the correctly specified model and robustness of PIV for misspecified models are investigated through a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) model and a structural equation model with ordinal indicators. The effects of sample size and nonnormality of the underlying continuous variables are also examined. The simulation results show that PIV produces robust factor loading estimates in the CFA model and in structural equation models. PIV also produces robust path coefficient estimates in the model where valid instruments are used. However, robustness highly depends on the validity of instruments.