Phase Morphology and Dynamic Mechanical Properties of Nylon 6 Based Blends Prepared via Successive In Situ Ring Opening Polymerization. Issue 4 (3rd April 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mohammadian-Gezaz, Somayyeh; Khoshhal, Abbas
• Is Part Of: Journal of macromolecular science. Volume 56:Issue 4(2017)
• Page Start: 262
• Page End: 278
• Publication Date: 2017-04-03
• Subjects: Activated anionic polymerization -- dynamic mechanical thermal analysis -- in situ polymerization and compatibilization -- macroactivator -- morphology -- nylon 6/ABS blends; Polymerization -- Periodicals; Polymers -- Periodicals; 530.413
• DOI: 10.1080/00222348.2017.1294319
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-2348

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS)/nylon 6 blends were prepared via in-situ polymerization and a compatibilization method with various blend compositions. The monomer of nylon 6 (ϵ-caprolactam) was polymerized using activated anionic ring opening polymerization in the presence of ABS. Hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI) and styrene maleic anhydride (SMA) were used as microactivator and macroactivator at different concentrations. Phase morphology and dynamic mechanical properties were evaluated; and the blending method was compared with ordinary reactive extruding (melt blending). In samples with dispersed structure, the dispersed particle size decreased with increasing SMA. Also, the effects of SMA at lower levels of HDI were more significant, probably due to competition between the activators in the reaction. In some of the in-situ prepared blends, even in the co-continuous structure, particles with sizes under 500 nm were observed. A noteworthy observation in micrographs was that the sizes of the dispersed particle prepared by the in situ method were less than those prepared by the compounding method. Even the uncompatibilized in situ samples had a finer particle size in comparison with the ordinary compatibilized samples. The phase inversion point was also investigated; it was affected by both micro and macro activator concentrations. At higher HDI or SMA content, a lower phase inversion concentration (φNylon6 ) was observed. In samples with an ABS dispersed phase, after in situ compatibilization using SMA, extraction of the ABS phase did not happen easily in the given time because of the surrounding copolymer at the particles surfaces. These blends had ultra-small particles (under 200 nm). Comparison of changes in the TgABS and TgNylon6 showed another interesting result. While the Tgs of samples prepared by the compounding method shifted about 3°C, the Tgs of samples prepared by the in situ method shifted more obviously (around 4–30°C). This indicated the powerful compatibilization caused by the in situ polymerization and compatibilization method. All results confirmed that the in situ polymerization and compatibilization method should be considered to be useful for production of ABS/nylon 6 blends.