Categories of Large Numbers in Line Estimation. (17th February 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Landy, David; Charlesworth, Arthur; Ottmar, Erin
• Is Part Of: Cognitive science. Volume 41:Number 2(2017)
• Page Start: 326
• Page End: 353
• Publication Date: 2016-02-17
• Subjects: Mathematical cognition -- Concepts -- Numerical magnitude -- Number line -- Mathematical misconceptions -- Numerical reasoning -- Category adjustment theory -- Neural reuse; Cognition -- Periodicals; Psycholinguistics -- Periodicals; Artificial intelligence -- Periodicals; 153.05
• DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12342
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0364-0213

Abstract

Abstract: How do people stretch their understanding of magnitude from the experiential range to the very large quantities and ranges important in science, geopolitics, and mathematics? This paper empirically evaluates how and whether people make use of numerical categories when estimating relative magnitudes of numbers across many orders of magnitude. We hypothesize that people use scale words—thousand, million, billion—to carve the large number line into categories, stretching linear responses across items within each category. If so, discontinuities in position and response time are expected near the boundaries between categories. In contrast to previous work (Landy, Silbert, & Goldin, 2013) that suggested only that a minority of college undergraduates employed categorical boundaries, we find that discontinuities near category boundaries occur in most or all participants, but that accurate and inaccurate participants respond in opposite ways to category boundaries. Accurate participants highlight contrasts within a category, whereas inaccurate participants adjust their responses toward category centers.