The Effects of Counterstereotypic Gender Strategies on Candidate Evaluations. Issue 2 (27th June 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bauer, Nichole M.
• Is Part Of: Political psychology. Volume 38:Issue 2(2017:Apr.)
• Page Start: 279
• Page End: 295
• Publication Date: 2016-06-27
• Subjects: female candidates -- gender stereotypes -- campaigns; Political psychology -- Periodicals; Political sociology -- Periodicals; 320.019
• DOI: 10.1111/pops.12351
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0162-895X

Abstract

Abstract : Voters do not associate female candidates with feminine stereotypes, but voters also do not associate female candidates with the qualities most valued in political leaders such as experience and knowledge. Current research offers conflicting conclusions on whether female candidates benefit from breaking with feminine norms or face a backlash for being too aggressive and not likable enough. Using a series of experiments, I show how counterstereotypic gender strategies, including women emphasizing masculine trait competencies, improve evaluations of female candidates along both masculine and feminine leadership dimensions. These results offer novel insights into how female candidates can overcome perceptual deficits among voters that they lack critical masculine leadership qualities. I also show that female candidates can overcome these biases without losing on traditional feminine strengths such as warmth and likability. However, counterstereotypic female candidates can face a "likability" backlash from out‐partisan voters. These findings suggest counterstereotypes may be more beneficial for female candidates in a primary election context when voters are copartisans rather than general elections where candidates often need cross‐partisan support.