Phantom rectum following abdominoperineal excision for rectal neoplasm: appearance and disappearance. (24th October 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Reategui, C.; Chiang, F. F.; Rosen, L.; Sands, D.; Weiss, E. G.; Wexner, S. D.
• Is Part Of: Colorectal disease. Volume 15:Number 10(2013)
• Page Start: 1309
• Page End: 1312
• Publication Date: 2013-10-24
• Subjects: Phantom rectum -- abdominoperineal excision -- myocutaneous flap -- anorectal neoplasia -- rectal sensation -- anal reconstruction; Colon (Anatomy) -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Rectum -- Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.34
• DOI: 10.1111/codi.12312
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1462-8910

Abstract

Abstract: Aim: The sensation that the rectum remains or is functioning after abdominoperineal excision (APE) is called phantom rectum (PR). Its postoperative and long‐term morbidity are not well documented. Informed consent may not include the risk and consequences of this condition. We assessed the incidence and morbidity of PR after APE and compared those with vs those without vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps. Method: Patients who underwent APE between 1 January 2004 and 31 December 2008 were identified. Preoperative radiation and operative reconstruction by vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flaps were noted. Patients were interviewed by telephone to assess the presence and timing of PR symptoms and their effect on quality of life. Results: Thirty‐six of 80 patients who underwent APE were available for follow‐up. Twenty‐three (64%) described PR symptoms including urgency to evacuate [22 (61%)], sensation of faeces in the rectum [19 (52%)] and sensation of passing flatus [17 (48%)]. Eleven (47%) who had VRAM vs 25 who did not, reported having symptoms of PR at < 3 months after APE. Patients described their symptoms as 'unchanged over time' [20 (56%)], 'gradually decreasing and ultimately disappearing' [13 (35%)] or 'worsening' [3 (9%)]. Preoperative radiation and laparoscopic approach were not associated with PR symptoms. Significantly more patients having a VRAM flap reported early PR symptoms [7/11 (64%) vs 4/25 (16%)] ( P = 0.008). Conclusion: PR sensations were experienced by 23 (64%) patients who underwent APE for rectal cancer. VRAM reconstruction was associated with early PR presentation. The possibility of PR should be discussed preoperatively in patients undergoing APE for anorectal neoplasm.