Avoiding pitfalls in L1-regularised inference of gene networks. Issue 1 (7th November 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Tjärnberg, Andreas; Nordling, Torbjörn E. M.; Studham, Matthew; Nelander, Sven; Sonnhammer, Erik L. L.
• Is Part Of: Molecular bioSystems. Volume 11:Issue 1(2015:Jan.)
• Page Start: 287
• Page End: 296
• Publication Date: 2014-11-07
• Subjects: Molecular biology -- Periodicals; Biochemistry -- Periodicals; 571.7405
• DOI: 10.1039/c4mb00419a
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1742-206X

Abstract

Abstract : L1 regularisation methods fail to infer the correct network even when the data are so informative that all existing links can be proven to exist. Abstract : Statistical regularisation methods such as LASSO and related L1 regularised regression methods are commonly used to construct models of gene regulatory networks. Although they can theoretically infer the correct network structure, they have been shown in practice to make errors, i.e. leave out existing links and include non-existing links. We show that L1 regularisation methods typically produce a poor network model when the analysed data are ill-conditioned, i.e. the gene expression data matrix has a high condition number, even if it contains enough information for correct network inference. However, the correct structure of network models can be obtained for informative data, data with such a signal to noise ratio that existing links can be proven to exist, when these methods fail, by using least-squares regression and setting small parameters to zero, or by using robust network inference, a recent method taking the intersection of all non-rejectable models. Since available experimental data sets are generally ill-conditioned, we recommend to check the condition number of the data matrix to avoid this pitfall of L1 regularised inference, and to also consider alternative methods.