WHAT'S TO KNOW ABOUT THE CREDIBILITY OF EMPIRICAL ECONOMICS?. (12th April 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ioannidis, John; Doucouliagos, Chris
• Is Part Of: Journal of economic surveys. Volume 27:Number 5(2013:Dec.)
• Page Start: 997
• Page End: 1004
• Publication Date: 2013-04-12
• Subjects: Bias -- Credibility -- Economics -- Meta‐research -- Replication -- Reproducibility; Economics -- Periodicals; 330
• DOI: 10.1111/joes.12032
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0950-0804

Abstract

Abstract: The scientific credibility of economics is itself a scientific question that can be addressed with both theoretical speculations and empirical data. In this review, we examine the major parameters that are expected to affect the credibility of empirical economics: sample size, magnitude of pursued effects, number and pre‐selection of tested relationships, flexibility and lack of standardization in designs, definitions, outcomes and analyses, financial and other interests and prejudices, and the multiplicity and fragmentation of efforts. We summarize and discuss the empirical evidence on the lack of a robust reproducibility culture in economics and business research, the prevalence of potential publication and other selective reporting biases, and other failures and biases in the market of scientific information. Overall, the credibility of the economics literature is likely to be modest or even low.