Behavioral analysis of analogical reasoning in design: Differences among designers with different expertise levels. (January 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Chai, Chunlei; Cen, Fei; Ruan, Weiyu; Yang, Cheng; Li, Hongting
• Is Part Of: Design studies. Volume 36(2015)
• Page Start: 3
• Page End: 30
• Publication Date: 2015-01
• Subjects: analogical reasoning -- design behavior -- design cognition -- design education; Design -- Periodicals; 745.405
• DOI: 10.1016/j.destud.2014.07.001
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0142-694X

Abstract

Abstract : This paper explores the impacts of the expertise level of designers during analogical reasoning. In study 1, participants were asked to select source examples and explain their selections. It was found that experts were more likely to consider Experience and Esthetics as reasons for their selections. Third-year students were more inclined to draw inspiration from Symbolism, whereas first-year students considered more about Function. Another group of participants took part in study 2, performing analogical design. The behaviors of participants during design process were coded and the behavioral frequencies as well as durations were analyzed. We conclude that experts and third-year students pay more attention to the completeness of the design, while first-year students put more efforts on the functionality of design. Highlights: We investigate differences among designers during analogical reasoning. Data analysis was processed by The Observer XT. Expertise levels and selection reasons are significantly related. Frequency and duration of design behaviors among participants are different.