Asthma control and concordance of opinions between patients and pulmonologists. (6th August 2013)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Asthma control and concordance of opinions between patients and pulmonologists. (6th August 2013)
- Main Title:
- Asthma control and concordance of opinions between patients and pulmonologists
- Authors:
- Urrutia, Isabel
Plaza, Vicente
Pascual, Silvia
Cisneros, Carolina
Entrenas, Luis M.
Luengo, María Teresa
Caballero, Fernando - Abstract:
- Abstract: Patient–physician opinion concordance could play a key role in asthma control. There have been no studies evaluating this association in large samples of patients. Objectives : To determine opinion concordance between asthma patients and their pulmonologists on the impact of the disease and to correlate concordance to asthma control. Methods : This was a cross-sectional multicentre study including 1160 patients and 300 pulmonologists. Patient–physician concordance rates were assessed by two semi-structured qualitative questionnaires: (1) impact of the disease and (2) treatment satisfaction. Subsequently, participating pulmonologists determined the concordance between their perceptions and their patient's. Sociodemographic and clinical data were recorded for all patients. Results : In 53.6% of cases, asthma was controlled. The rate of patient–pulmonologist concordance on disease impact on patient daily life was 57%, with physicians underestimating the impact (compared to patients) in 26% of cases. Concordance on satisfaction with treatment was 56%, with physicians underestimating satisfaction in 26% of cases. Patient–physician discordance rates were significantly lower among patients with controlled asthma (29 and 32.1%) than those with poor control (73.7 and 73.1%). Conclusions : Patient–pulmonologist concordance on perceptions of disease impact is low, particularly in uncontrolled asthma. This poor concordance should be addressed in education programmes,Abstract: Patient–physician opinion concordance could play a key role in asthma control. There have been no studies evaluating this association in large samples of patients. Objectives : To determine opinion concordance between asthma patients and their pulmonologists on the impact of the disease and to correlate concordance to asthma control. Methods : This was a cross-sectional multicentre study including 1160 patients and 300 pulmonologists. Patient–physician concordance rates were assessed by two semi-structured qualitative questionnaires: (1) impact of the disease and (2) treatment satisfaction. Subsequently, participating pulmonologists determined the concordance between their perceptions and their patient's. Sociodemographic and clinical data were recorded for all patients. Results : In 53.6% of cases, asthma was controlled. The rate of patient–pulmonologist concordance on disease impact on patient daily life was 57%, with physicians underestimating the impact (compared to patients) in 26% of cases. Concordance on satisfaction with treatment was 56%, with physicians underestimating satisfaction in 26% of cases. Patient–physician discordance rates were significantly lower among patients with controlled asthma (29 and 32.1%) than those with poor control (73.7 and 73.1%). Conclusions : Patient–pulmonologist concordance on perceptions of disease impact is low, particularly in uncontrolled asthma. This poor concordance should be addressed in education programmes, particularly for patients with uncontrolled symptoms. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of asthma. Volume 50:Number 8(2013)
- Journal:
- Journal of asthma
- Issue:
- Volume 50:Number 8(2013)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 50, Issue 8 (2013)
- Year:
- 2013
- Volume:
- 50
- Issue:
- 8
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2013-0050-0008-0000
- Page Start:
- 877
- Page End:
- 883
- Publication Date:
- 2013-08-06
- Subjects:
- Control/management -- education -- quality of life
Asthma -- Periodicals
616.238005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ytsr20#.V6niC1JTF-V ↗
http://informahealthcare.com/journal/jas ↗
http://informahealthcare.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.3109/02770903.2013.819886 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0277-0903
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4947.295000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 2099.xml